smollittlefrog @ smollittlefrog @lemdro.id

Posts

0

Comments

107

Joined

2 yr. ago

Is this standardized sizing for men's clothes in the room with us right now?

What am I looking at?

I hope this gets ported to Windows. I use Linux, but many of my friends don't and won't.

I recently (two months ago) had to work with an Excel sheet which worked on OnlyOffice but not LibreOffice. So compatibility seems to still not be on par.

I'm not a native english speaker. I'm sorry if my spelling makes my comments difficult to read.

I think I mostly understood the point by now.

(I still don't get why the man would be uncomfortable with the alternative hypersexualization, since he already perceives the initial depiction as hypersexualized, but that doesn't seem to be central to the point anyways.)

It's not a real quote. It's the meaning I understood this post to imply.

(My interpretation was already challenged by @Crozekiel below.)

If the boss has no problem keeping it on the backlog forever, then apparently it isn't an issue worth dealing with.

It didn't load for me either. It did load when I opened the post in my browser.

(I think the difference is that it adds ?format=webp in the browser.)

https://pictrs.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/65a49e6b-bf3c-4cf1-82ce-0f223ac8dadb.jpeg?format=webp

the man in the comic became uncomfortable seeing it

I don't understand this point. The reason they're uncomfortable with it is because they're drawn in a sexualized manner? But even if all else is true, men in comics are already drawn in a way that many men think is attractive.

At least that's how I understand the point of the "power fantasy". Or do they mean literal physical strength with the "power fantasy"? Because the sexualization of men is definitely not limited to muscles.

Assuming the power fantasy is not just about physical strength, but also (or only) about extreme attractiveness (as perceived by men):

That is an idea that could be true. Are there statistics about how close the typical male hypersexualization is to women's interests compared to how close the typical female hypersexualization is to men's interests?

Did I misunderstand the post?

The point seemed to be that sexualization of men and women is different because not all women like the typical sexualized male man (as per the example given). That being different implies that men do all like the typical sexualized woman. Which is wrong.

(edit: just realized I did a reverse menandfemales)

Women have differing tastes. Men on the other hand all like the same.

Just like many women don't like extreme muscley figures many men don't like extreme hourglass figures.

Not all women are the same. Not all men are the same either. Claiming otherwise is sexist in both cases.

behavior and culture are founded in material conditions and environment

What is that even supposed to mean? Like yes, people have always existend in an environment centered around material resources. Food being a material resource, for example.

But you don't want to think about any of the realities.

I assume that by "any of the realities" you mean "other perspectives" or "other ideologies" here.

I do want to think about other perspectives and ideologies.

But I also allow myself to criticize them.

I especially allow myself to criticize people who try to prevent others from telling their perspectives, for example by calling them a misanthrope in a demeaning manner.

Change = Marxism

That perhaps one should consider non-utopian images of humans when discussing systems present in society.

That makes sense. I didn't attempt to decipher what sw meant because it didn't seem relevant to the story.

Is the Shanghai maglev perhaps subsidized?

I only consider input by people who share the same beliefs as me (of humans being happy little faries who do no wrong).

Do you realize you're building your personal echo chamber?

feminine enough to survive other ways

Is this supposed to imply prostitution?

claiming the GDPR is good =/= claiming the GDPR is flawless