Skip Navigation

User banner
Sleepless One
Posts
24
Comments
140
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Regarding the markdown point for lemmy-ui, I think part of the issue is that we don't use a markdown parser tailored to our purposes. We use markdown-it, and our custom (non-common mark, so stuff like the spoiler blocks) stuff uses plugins for it like this one. One of these days I'd like to make a markdown parser specifically for Lemmy.

  • Chilling in the morning before I start my day job.

  • I get a chuckle out of the "Tankie Triad" talking point some people keep using. It sounds like a villain organization from a Saturday morning cartoon.

  • Yes, it's the commies who are the naive ones. \s

  • So basically, why limit the government which fucks you up, if you can become the government yourself and fuck up everyone you don’t like instead.

    Yes

  • Username checks out.

  • The state under a dictatorship of the booj exists to suppress the proles and mediate conflicts between booj so they can more effectively suppress the proles. Proletarian dictatorship states are based af though.

  • I basically use it as a way to acknowledge that I saw a message but have nothing further to ask or add.

  • C# is usually used server-side. How would nuget bloat affect client-side applications that users use?

  • Look at this incredible new species! \s

  • Fig jam. A local place makes a fig jam and bacon artisanal pizza that's to die for.

  • I think Marx would really dig that How It's Made show from back in the day.

  • You've heard people use the term "tankie" IRL? Damn, even the most brainpoisoned libs I know don't do that.

  • The spoiler syntax is a bit different.

     
        
    :::spoiler <label>
    <body>
    :::
    
      

    For example:

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • You're supposed to use one as a sounding rod.

  • I'm guessing "agency" in this case is being used in a way that's very specific to that area of research and not exactly how people use it in normal conversation?

  • I'm too lazy and tired to go into it at the moment, so I'm just going to paste this infographic explaining the relationship between the material base and ideological superstructure.

    To the falsifiability point, while I can't say a lot without knowing the specifics that Popper argued, historical materialism (and dialectical materialism, the way of understanding the world historical materialism comes from) don't on the surface make much sense trying to attack from a falsifiability angle. While one could attempt to disprove, say, the extraction of surplus value through profit or the tendency of the rate of profit to fall being properties of capitalism (these are claims about the world that can conceivably be true or false), dialectical/historical materialism is the tool used to analyze the world, attempt to change the world based on the understanding from that analysis, incorporate the lessons learned from those attempts (be they failed or successful) into one's understanding of the world, and repeat. It's basically a way of gaining knowledge about the world, as well as an explanation of how people get knowledge.

    Again, I'd have to check out Popper's full argument for the specifics, but I don't know how one can make assertions about the falsifiability of what is basically an epistemology without committing some kind of category error.

  • Yes. It's an abomination.

  • Where does SAFe fall into this?