slackassassin @ slackassassin @sh.itjust.works

Posts

3

Comments

718

Joined

2 yr. ago

Ya, kinda and it is a pretty funny answer. Jack uses a slightly different process called the Lincoln county process. Basically, they filter it through charcoal made from maple wood.

That still meets the requirements for Bourbon, but they wanted to have their own "Tennessee whiskey" definition that includes the Lincoln process. Although, I don't know who else uses it other than them and Dickle.

So, ya, bourbon subset that doesn't want to be called bourbon because it's Tennessee whiskey. Lol.

Ya, that's because it's not Bourbon. Which kinda proves the point, right.

Lol, what? You are just riding on some xenophobia tip or something. You know the fact that there is a ton of American whiskey that is not called bourbon kinda disproves your whole prejudice, right? Whatever, keep stewing in it I guess.

Yes, it must be made in the us. Scotch also has to be made in Scotland. But nobody is out here saying it's Scottish ego. They just know the flavor profile of scotch. But you can make similar things elsewhere, true.

No, not all whiskeys are required to be fermented in a new charred oak barrels. That's what produces the typical smokey flavor associated with bourbon. All bourbon is whiskey, but not all whiskey is bourbon. That's like saying all other grain whiskey that doesn't use corn is Scotch.

Straight bourbon is required to be 51% corn, aged in chared oak barrels for at least 2 years, and must be at least 80 proof.

Of course none of that makes it better, because it's just preferences like anything else anyway. But bourbon is its own thing.

It doesn't work like that at all. Not everyone who smokes has a pack a day habit. It varies wildly and doesn't require some uniform steady state.

Someone who has a morning cigarette just wants a morning cigarette. Social smokers may not even smoke everyday.

It's just that those who DO make the habit more frequent, pack a day etc., will maintain THAT level.

Those who use vaporizers are able to create different patterns because of the nature of the device. Doesn't have a finite time limit like a single cigarette and differing nicotine amounts, etc.

It's ok, you don't seem to have the capability that others did.

Most probably not. Although it does happen.

That anecdote has been around for a long time. But they all hired somebody. Probably somebody without 5 years exp.

Masturbatory self righteousness more like.

The point about a county not being able to be pacifist the way that an individual can be is the same reason that the requirements proposed would require universal adoption. The aim of pacifism is irrelevant when it's the target.

I understand what you're saying and I'm not certain either.

But, given that the context is a response to concern, it makes it sound like they're suggesting that she's gunning for the outcome. Like "don't worry about them they're all setup now." A nobody who is now a champion of liberalism.

It just reads weird. Maybe they are just an ernest doomer who believes nobody is employable, but also thinks that everything will work out here. Stranger things have happened. ¯(ツ)/¯

Right? The framing of that comment is very strange. Suspicious even.

That's also weird, though. "Like the rest of us" means nothing, plenty are employable, a vast majority are actually.

So, to assume they "probably went from unemployable" to winning the job lottery with a nonprofit is certainly a take.

If only.

I agreed with this up until the 'and'.

Ya, everyone supports workers until the bill arrives.

3 seems to contradict 1 otherwise it wouldn't be a moral duty.

My kids bring me great joy. I share my hobbies with them and adopt theirs. Spending time with them is not a loss or hindrance. Having kids is not for everyone and that's fine, but the negativity online it outright toxic.