Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SL
Posts
3
Comments
721
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I understand and know about this stuff. But thanks for youtube vids. Gruyère has been making cheese continuously since the 12th century and is now available worldwide. That happened without this.

  • Not sure those numbers back some prohibition ice cream conspiracy to make everyonelove cheese. But industry certainly met demand throughout industrialization. It's sold to us like everything else, and maybe we shouldn't buy so much of it, but all it really had to do was be awesome.

  • Love Carlin. Hate this quote.

    1. "Half of them are smarter than that" is just as true but doesn't have the same zing.
    2. The zing is that the regurgitation makes everyone feel as though they are on the right side of the distribution and thus superior.

    Truth is, we are all closer to chimps than Einstein. And Einstein still left some lingering questions for us to solve.

    That's the distribution. Not "Everyone is stupid except me and you, dear reader."

  • So you don't have an answer, that's fine, figured as much. Hand waiving, indeed.

    Irrational actors are unpredictable in compounding ways. The concept is a meta analysis of the individual and the masses. Biases, irrational fear, herd dynamics, etc. These can lead to unpredictable outcomes.

    But markets can still function, sometimes, because of other factors. Leverage, venture investment, loss management, mergers and acquisition, etc. And learning from witnessing a counterintuitive market dynamic.

    In this, most basic example, there are no compounding factors in either case. There are no buyers. So, their irrationally is not a factor. And there is only production of a supply that has no demand.

    Someone producing a degradable product that has no buyers is not what is meant when discussing irrational actors.

    It's not referring to some crazy person who will just operate at a loss forever. And even if it was, they couldn't even do it forever if they wanted to.

    Dodging the question, plugging your ears, and saying, "I heard a term one time that says they could be crazy and would just keep doing it forever for no reason. Prove me wrong." Is not the gotcha argument you think it is.

    Basic markets are not capitalism.

  • Best take, honestly. It's tribalism. People love to generalize and lean on prejudice to feel superior to a broad swath of people based on things largely out of their control. Which is exactly why the same approach also happens to work as propaganda.