diegeticscream[all]🔻 @ simply_surprise @lemmygrad.ml

[any/all]

---

Read more

Posts

12

Comments

233

Joined

4 yr. ago

The nuclear weapons are the only thing stopping the U$ from murdering 20% of their population and razing 80% of their buildings. Again.

The sanctions are meant to torture the civilians. It's siege warfare.

The most important claim I think he made was that north koreans are starving.

Source?

Who are they even fighting?

They are still at war. The U$ occupies half the peninsula.

Why does Kim's family still get to live a lavish lifestyle?

Who says he is?

Democratic socialism is nearer to anarcho communism than those far right wingers.

The argument in the source, as I understand it, is that democratic socialism doesn't firmly oppose fascism with force, so tacitly allows it to develop.

Also you want me to prove I'm Brazilian!? How am I supposed to do that?

Naw, I just thought it was funny to write. You're welcome to ignore that.

You still haven't sourced your claims on the DPRK, though.

DPRK is a totalitarian dictatorship that isn't truly socialist.

Source?

they aren't really good at all.

Source?

The real socialism is the Democratic Socialism.

Democratic Socialism is objectively the moderate wing of fascism

I am a BRAZILIAN socialist.

SOURCE?

It's sad how propagandized Amerikkkans can be. Who taught you to hate strangers as deeply as you do? What has the DPRK done to you?

I hope the resources I have available to share can help you start the process of healing.

Best of luck!

She also says you can have an otter pop, if you want one. It's summer.

Lol nice

I understand you have that belief, I do not share it and find your self-righteous tone to be very unpleasant. I do not want to continue interacting with you.

Yeah, this one is a pretty daunting 55 hour audiobook!

I just started "Oathbreaker", the next one in the Stormlight Archives. I'm enjoying the series so far!

Mine is "Blood Meridian" by Cormac McCarthy. A poetic and brutal read, the language is really fascinating and it always gives me a lot to think about.

Aight, I deleted my comment because it was uncharitable and I don't want to continue this conversation anymore.

, and not paint a subjective picture of what it is to be convenient to you as to serve a display of superiority.

This is the kind of weird, condescending, shit that I find offensive.

You've managed to make it through 4 paragraphs, and I'm even more confused as to why you're talking to me.

It seemed like you were arguing for a low-tech, anarchist, society, and now you're trying to condescend me for not arguing correctly against Anarchism?

Lack of social organization results in massive death and misery,

This is what I'm trying to illustrate in my original comment. You're still so fucking fixated on my use of "I" and the specific example of "bullet trains" that you can't see that.

and not paint a subjective picture of what it is to be convenient to you as to serve a display of superiority.

Are you saying I'm not allowed to want things? Fuck you, I can have dreams and passion. My dreams are for a high-tech future society that can provide for everyone. That necessitates highly efficient transportation, like bullet trains, as illustrated by current successful Socialist projects.

What the fuck is your point?

No there is a code of conduct among true proletarians and then there is lumpen proletariat that behave like punks and thugs, anti-social and a disgrace among proletarians

"People who are mean to me are criminals" is fucking absurd. Have you ever had a job? Are you actually a kid?

You're here arguing for Anarchism, which means you're not a comrade and aren't here in good faith. What is there to be nice about?

And what the fuck have you spoken like? Does dithering about my use of "I" make you a true idealist?

Hold on. Fuck you. You skipped the meat of the comment to snip at my use of "I" in the end.

Argue against the argument or fuck off.

This is a really long-winded way of saying "diabetics should die from bathtub insulin".

Which, again, this is a completely false definition of Anarchism's proposed slogan and is mostly made up.

No it's not.

If the Anarchist says they are against the existence of the State, then that makes their desire ultimately the same as ours - a communist mode of production.

They don't want what we want. We want a highly efficient, industrialized, centrally administered society, but without "special bodies of armed men" and without class oppression.

I want bullet trains, I don't want to barter for dubious insulin.

Yeah, I think we broke him. He got banned by our mods now tho.