shrugal @ shrugal @lemm.ee

Also [@shrugal@lemmy.world](https://lemmy.world/u/shrugal).

---

Read more

Posts

2

Comments

525

Joined

2 yr. ago

Incredible innovation, so brave!

Oh look, the EU threatens to investigate and potentially fine them, and suddenly there IS a way to preserve "security and privacy" with web apps. It's almost like the initial reasoning for the change was complete bullshit!

It's still only halfway there, but at least they are not removing existing functionality anymore. Let's see how the EU likes this new "only WebKit" restriction.

The article even explicitly lists subsidiaries and holdings with >50% of the ownership or voting rights, so I don't think it's limited to just one department or devision of a company. But yea, we'll have to wait and see how this is applied in a real case.

Piped consists of a frontend, a backend and a proxy. The frontend is the site you see, the backend stores all the data like video information, user accounts and subscriptions, and the proxy loads the videos you watch from YT. The only thing it doesn't do is download and store the videos, it'll always stream them on demand.

And there is FirefoxPWA, an extension to add pretty solid PWA support on desktop.

Pretty much all sources as far as I understand it. The exact definition is here if you're interested (Article 5).

Up to 10% of global revenue, 20% if they keep repeating the same offense, so nothing to sneeze at.

Isn't it the other way around? Afaik the EU commission investigates them, makes a decision, and sets a due date for Apple to comply or pay a potentially hefty fine. It would be Apple who'd have to sue against that, and they'd have to pay the fine until a court confirms or nullifies it.

The company said cutting off PWAs was part of an effort to comply with the Digital Markets Act, arguing browsers other than its own Safari software would expose users to security and privacy risks that were not permitted under the law.

They are so full of shit, it's unbelievable! Are they really claiming that their own browser is THE ONLY legal browser there is?!

You can run console.clear = () => {} in the console to override and disable the clear method.

I recently started transcoding my media to save some space, and I went with h265 instead. AV1 will be great in a few years, but the hardware support is just not there yet.

The problematic ones for that are mostly recommendation algorithms afaik, but there are others like gamification ofc. You can call them engagement algorithms if you want to be a bit more broad. But that's what I mean when I criticize "algorithmic" platforms, and I think that's what most people mean when they talk about algorithms in this context.

There was some Internet outrage the other day: Google pauses Gemini’s ability to generate people after overcorrecting for diversity in historical images

I think email is federated, but it's not a social network in the usual sense of the word. You don't have public feeds and profiles and such. Mailing lists are probably the closest thing, but you still have to subscribe to those to receive messages.

And which algorithms would that be?

I'm referring to recommendation algorithms, the bad thing about them is that they can be used to manipulate people. Algorithms in general are fine of course.

Personally I think it's more important to break big-tech's hold on online communication. Every single user who leaves a centralized platform to join the Fediverse is a win in my books! Another thing is that we never had a mainstream decentralized, nonprofit and non-algorithmic social network before afaik, I'm actually not sure if the climate will evolve like it did with the other networks.

I think they would welcome Reddit users with open arms. As I said back then, the problem was not the content of the posts, but the fact that bots were posting them. The fact is that we perceive communication differently depending on the sender and the context, even if it's the same message content, basically 1st semester communication science in a nutshell. You just can't reduce communication to a simple exchange of ascii characters and make assumptions based purely on that.

Yeah I really quite enjoyed this discussion! I know I can sound a bit mean sometimes, but I truly hope your plans to promote the Fediverse work out!

adapting to a new scenario

I still think it's a bit arrogant of you to assume you have the right to tell people how they are supposed to use Lemmy. Imo the bots started being harmful/annoying, but you stopped it at that point, idk how it would have evolved if you didn't. And ofc being blocked by LW didn't really make things better.

I honestly see it as a moral imperative

I actually think you're completely right, but people act according to their own opinions and not necesarrily moral standards or logical reasoning. It won't make a difference whether you're morally correct or not if they just don't agree and you keep pushing.

This is not about taking the first step, this is about what direction to pick in the first place. You proposed one, I (and others) pointed out what might be problems with it. If you still think it's the best course of action then by all means go forward with it. Just be mindful that you can also do harm if you overdo do it, like giving Lemmy a bad rep by trying too hard to convince people to switch. Or ... you know ... creating a million bots or something.