Call me Lenny/Leni @ shinigamiookamiryuu @lemm.ee

It's nice to meet all you. I am she/her, can speak Toki Pona and English (n

---

Read more

Posts

138

Comments

5,088

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

When it comes to the "hate", is it "misanthropic" or "social-pressure-based" or something else?

Seeing a lot of how people inclinationally are by default gives me a small bit of relatability for the first one.

I mean "political bend" never came off as perfect if you ask me. Most people who are in a certain group will have at least a few things about it they think differently about. So I imagine asking about it will always be uniquely determining.

Can you give an example?

Same. Not that I am particularly known for talkativeness (the term "selectively mute" is often used to describe me, which many here think is facade-ish because they don't realize is more associated with anxiety than autism), but I have Pacific heritage and it shows in what amounts to a Kiwi accent. People either...

1. Think I'm Australian
2. Think I'm Scottish
3. Think I'm a Star Wars fangirl (because some people say they have only heard it from Jango Fett)
4. Think I'm faking my voice and that this is why it sounds like it does
5. Know it's a real voice and what dialect it is but think I've ever been to New Zealand

And then they will proceed to ask me to pronounce silly words for them. Apparently "should" is not pronounced like "shit".

Based on someone's instruction, I once tried a kind of voiceover tech for fixing communication, and that only blew up in its own way, people thinking it felt "ungenuine".

How did you find out?

Why would you say something you don't mean?

Because it's too deep in the skin. It's also why foot itches are so bad, because it has more skin so you can walk long distances.

Context for this and for everything in the OP.

I never said it wasn't me. But the anon isn't. The way messages there work is you say something in a private exchange, and that only becomes visible when the person you sent it to responds. The response is mine, but the anonymous inquiry isn't.

I use that to explain my perspective. I don't refer to myself there as if it's not me it's talking about (why would anyone who has read it get the impression I do). I'm not sure why "obsessive" is the first word that comes to peoples' minds (or why others get off the hook), what I deal with simply has an exhausting persistence and I wonder when it will end.

You mean nobody else comes to mind, it's just two specific people?

You're welcome :)

You are the guest here. You go somewhere else. My art does not exist anywhere else. I am not the thief you want to present me as under threat of being called a sealion. You are simply operating on targeting tactics.

You didn’t “change mediums”. You posted those stolen pictures on an impersonation account 5 months ago.

Prove it. Show me the originals. That has always been the rule with reporting art theft, you have to show the originals.

Your Newgrounds account, attempting to impersonate Art-Dude, a forum regular from DeviantArt who wasn’t on your side when you said those things to a 14 year old boy, and then you attempted to gaslight in the profile description about a site being “mistaken” in case someone happens to find the real Art-Dude and begins to get suspicious.

That's called quelling misunderstandings. Would you rather I hadn't clarified anything? The site also operates on a very different naming system, hence the generic name, which is gender-neutral.

As for the art, I changed mediums and got into trading. Big deal. If you think I've stolen art, show me the original.

for the time being

^

And what I meant by that is they were "ghostwriting" for me, which goes even deeper than the "commissioning" I mentioned.

You're probably going to keep dangling that misunderstanding over peoples' heads and you're only going to get the same response each time. It's not "gaslighting", it's literally pointing out not everything is as simple as you claim.

If a marriage document was written with the nuance we said those things in, including what you claim about the "I" (which actually throws your claims about DID into question), it wouldn't be legally binding because they're so situationally specific.

All this coming from the same person (you) who thinks I'm a compulsive liar. If you think I'm a compulsive liar, why do you take things I say that suit you as gospel? I would speculate it's because that's not what this is all about.

If you're so convinced that I have ever set out to impersonate anyone, that I ever said I was from the UK, or even that the other Niotabunny has DID, cite an example of any instance where this was outright mentioned. For starters, you act like there isn't a Leicester right South of Rochester where I've been for a while.

Nobody "pays" anyone. We just try to adapt to what we do and don't have access/visibility to. Some of it is cross-verbatim. Saying anyone should be treated as the same as another individual for saying things they wanted to be said is like saying one classmate should be expelled from school for relaying things on behalf of another classmate. I do not encourage address doxxing, but I can say without a doubt that, if someone were to do that on us, there wouldn't be any repeated results. We are simply not related in any way except doing things on behalf of each other (sometimes word for word), and the fact no rule enforcer (keep in mind they can see when people have doubles, in fact you can probably ask one directly) has ever called me a ban evader should be the smoking gun of that.

Niotabunny responded to this misunderstanding. The two halves of their first sentence doesn't even sound the same. They and CraigOhMyEggo are not me, I am not them, and putting words in peoples' mouth does not make them their words, no matter what excuse you want to give to say it's right to put words in someone's mouth, including with things I said to some person three years ago that you feel the right to go everywhere to "expose". They're my words and my intentions to elaborate on, and in one of those cases, even how it came across wasn't negative. Funny how you validate your own speculation before invalidating someone's explicitly mentioned DID (which I don't have and never said I had).

@Serinus@lemmy.world a little help please?

That would not fit the particular situation.

Isn't the method of death of victims of the Death Note a heart attack? That sounds rather uncomfortable for a form a euthanasia.

It's not a hard rule you broke, but you also used "nested parentheses".