seven_phone @ seven_phone @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

457

Joined

1 yr. ago

Not to go off on a quite wild tangent from societal collapse but I think beyond propaganda Napoleon was often flanked by tall and hand-picked elite guards and ironically also old aristocracy generals themselves tall from richer diet and so appeared short in comparison.

You can always see the signal in the noise, that is the point of the signal and therein lies the rub.

It will all end with us back on dialup speeds once the counter-DAITA throughput machine learning de-obfuscation analysis of defense against AI guided traffic analysis of proxy anomised packets starts. I think I might just read a book.

The plundering of communities for profit to the point of collapse is being overseen by the people put in place to protect and manage society and now there is surprise and shock that people will not go home and quietly starve to death?

Barron is way too tall.

It is why they are hastily trying to turn the calendar back to 1933 but they might overshoot and get 1789.

The great business minds running these public services into the ground for profit without any thought for the society that needs them and patting themselves on the back for being so business savvy should maybe stop plundering monopolies and move into the actual private sector and see how able they are there with real competition but I think we know the answer to that one. And while we are about it we could stop tax payer funded regulatory and watchdog bodies that are constantly learning lessons after being discovered to not even provide the most basic functionality for which they were set up and then going right back to the same old willful negligence.

Even Alanis Morissette would recognise this was ironic.

Fast living and easy sex do seem to turn into easy living and slow sex.

So we are just not mentioning 'bedtime set by my Master'?

The archive / mirror copy is actually a pleasant uncluttered read on a phone screen if you rotate to the horizontal. I talk only in practical terms, have not actually read due to other distraction.

These restrictions are no laughing matter.

Strong defence is having some balls.

Be proud and stop keep dwelling on past sins, you know the sins I am talking about right?

The woman in the article is from England and I am too and I can not argue this anymore because the thread is overly replied to by American liberals who are just so universally indoctrinated by corporations to work against themselves. Moving towards renewable energy is probably the noblest cause of the modern world but these protest groups are corporate guided to nullify themselves and make the public see their views as crackpot. Do you think the corporations became as powerful as they are by sitting in the fucking road. No they marshalled their powers and lobbied governments. That is how change is effected by law, to implement unlawful means is to invite chaos which makes all your effort impotent. It would be remarkably easy and inexpensive to switch over almost entirely to renewables and the oil industry knows it so it makes you look like clowns, so no one listens to you. And you swallow it completely and put on your red noses and dance around for them.

Yes exactly and this reply is being similarly downvoted but without any response to what I asked. The people advocating unlawful disruptive action which leads to rule by the strongest are too timid to reply alongside their anonymous downvote. How would they fair in the world they are wishing for.

Corporations are acting within the law, admittedly that law might not be fit for purpose but it is still the law. The disruption is unlawful and a different category of thing, you can not allow some unlawful acts and frown on others.

She was laying in the road impeding traffic, what about the individual child alone at the school gates because their parent is unable to reach them. It is you that is using selective logic, if you allow any unlawful act you allow them all.