Ok very long and detailed response, i was responding to the initial comments that explicitly said if you give ai a made up thing it will definitely hallucinate. Which i demonstrated to be false in (multiple times). I'm not suggesting it doesn't hallucinate a lot of the time still, but the comments were making out its 100% broken, and it clearly works for many queries very effectively, despite its limited applications. Im just suggesting we don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Oh ok thanks i thought this thread was about AI LLMs in general.
Weird i was downvoted for demonstrating the very thing that apparently (according to these very learned comments) AI can't do, actually doing it well. Seems like irrational bubble hate to me, common on reddit but getting more so on Lemmy it seems. "that guys asking topic based questions that make our comments look poorly thought out and potentially wrong, burn him"
What's your view of the fizbang Raspberry blasters?
Gpt 'I'm not familiar with "fizbang Raspberry blasters." Could you provide more details or clarify what they are?'
It's a drink making machine from china
Gpt 'I don't have any specific information on the "fizbang Raspberry blasters" drink making machine. If it's a new or niche product, details might be limited online.'
So, in this instance is didn't hallucinate, i tried a few more made up things and it's consistent in saying it doesn't know of these.
VERGE articles seem to be getting worse over the years, they've almost reached Forbes level, yes this does raise some valid safety concerns. No Tesla isn't bad just because it's Tesla.
It doesn't really give us the full picture. For starters, there's no comparison with Level 2 systems from other car makers, which also require driver engagement and have their own methods to ensure attention. This would help us understand how Tesla's tech actually measures up.
Plus, the piece skips over extremely important stats that would give us a clearer idea of how safe (or not) Tesla's systems are compared to good old human driving.
We're left in the dark about how Tesla compares in scenarios like drunk, distracted, or tired driving—common issues that automation aims to mitigate. (probably on purpose).
It feels like the article is more about stirring up feelings against Tesla rather than diving deep into the data. A more genuine take would have included these comparisons and variables, giving us a broader view of what these technologies mean for road safety.
I feel like any opportunity to jump on the Elon hate wagon is getting tiresome. (and yes i hate Elon too).
Um.... Idk was it? Your tone seems overly aggressive, perhaps your worried about climate change, but don't worry! We've still got time to make meaningful changes on an individual level, Despite 70% of ongoing emissions arising from 100 companies. (i saw recently via a cartoon in here) so turn that frown upside down!
Fwiw, i own a m3 and the doors open just fine as regular manual doors, the door handle is very obvious and it works anytime, including software updates (I've tried it), it also doesn't break anything.
Fwiw i also hate Musk and am embarrassed to be associated with a company he is ceo of. But this is a story about a very very stupid person, not a car design issue.
Well i'm not a scientist (actually I am, but not a climate scientist), but im gunna take a wild flailing stab in the dark and suggest it's maybe due to unfettered fossil fuel emissions.
Call me crazy but i think this might be what's happening here.
The relentless muddling of metric with imperial measurements is not only bewildering but an absolute affront to rationality.
When dealing with the critical precision of LD-50 values, why persist with this nonsensical jumble instead of adopting the metric system entirely?
The table's careless presentation of 'gms/Kg' without specifying units in each entry is a grotesque oversight.
Is this some cruel American prank designed to torment and confuse the rest of the world?