set_secret @ set_secret @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

460

Joined

2 yr. ago

"Save the planet? Sure, but only if it doesn't slightly inconvenience my leisure activities or make me wait a bit longer." This mindset perfectly encapsulates why we're in such a mess: an astounding commitment to personal comfort at the expense of the planet's future. It's like saying, "I'll help fight climate change, but only if it's on my terms and doesn't affect my ski trips." Because, obviously, ensuring our convenience is far more critical than addressing a global crisis. It’s this precise “me first, planet later” attitude that’s steering us towards an ecological disaster, yet here we are....

exactly

i think it's more we're likely fucked much faster than we thought we were initially fucked. I personally suspect the positive feedback will result in us being fucked even quicker, reaching peak fucked in years rather than decades, the date of completly fucked has reliably moved forward over the past 5 years. chances are we're already past the point of no return.

lol so funny people can't read a paper and reactively downvote anyone who contradicts what they feel reality should be. You're correct until we find a way to disprove this (eg somebody repeats it and finds it flawed) obviously robust study we need treat it as fact.

he also advocated for homoeopathy......maybe that's what he'll treat his cancer with (i hope so)

fed it to gpt:

Briar and Cwtch stand out as recommended for private communication, both featuring end-to-end encryption by default, utilization of Perfect Forward Secrecy, and encryption at rest on both server and client sides. They are also decentralized and not dependent on DNS, which enhances privacy and security.

i find it frustrating if i can't immediately tell the poster of a site their content is wrong or sucks or is generally bad. therefore social media is my only option, because the world must know my valuable contributions.....🤌🤌

in aus they were called demountables. but i never saw a single one demounted. the ones at my old primary school are still there 30 years later.

Thank you for a voice of reason and the ability to understand the written word.

I honestly thought i was going insane reading these comments full of people confidently, (but yet seemingly unaware of) disproving their own positions. And with such venom too.

The level of salt people have for their love of sugar is truly off the scale in this thread.

real mature

i don't understand your point. i simply pointed out that there is indeed more sugar in milk choc than chocolate. i don't think anyone can deny sugar isn't the first and most dominating flavour of milk chocolate. sure it hasa choc after-taste. The other examples were silly because they all referenced things that didn't have the dominant flavour or indeed the dominant ingredient they were attempting to mock.

Why you and apparently 19 others are butt hurt about the fact milk choc is mostly sugar both ingredient wise and flavour wise is frankly bizarre to me.

ok bro, well enjoy your sugar.

yeah but that's the last ingredient.

yeah that's a better analogy. lol @ the downvotes

The first statement is actully true though, there is more sugar in milk chocolate than chocolate. the others are all obviously incorrect, there is more pickles, more chicken etc.

wow that's super fucked up

wow this is sad.

i use companies that still put the little X button at the end of their posts as a filter to stop visiting them. I've found it very helpful.

i thought American kids got free school lunches?

ikr internet Explorer? but safari a ok