seeigel @ seeigel @feddit.org

Posts

0

Comments

312

Joined

5 mo. ago

Please don't ignore my second paragraph.

You are welcome.

What's your opinion if you don't mind me asking?

It's the wrong side to tackle the problem.

Wages can be risen with an increased demand for workers. How? That is the relevant question that leads to the right answers. Minimum wage is a distraction.

That's the challenge. I still believe that it is possible.

Thank you.

I wrote mental capacity because stress, irregular schedules, two jobs and all the other stuff drain energy and trap even clever people. Intelligence is only part of the problem.

My point is that they are not stupid but helpless. Usually I argue that there shouldn't be minimum wage and that people have to organize to earn more, but I can see that it makes sense for that group.

Still, as we can see, relying on others is not sustainable. Minimum wage workers have to find a way to rise their wages on their own.

None. I rather change myself than wasting time on changing something that won't last forever anyway.

Why does it have to be dictated? People can freely organize in a democratic way.

The problem is that people may join just because it is better, without fully supporting the respect towards others that is needed in such a system.

Not now but soon: lemmy.

Make the logout random. This creates addiction which will turn lemmy into mindcrack.

I agree, for the way our societies are structured.

My point is that we could organize us in a way that history could provide additional depth but that the essential decisions could be made as well without the knowlege of history.

Without joking, most likely I would watch more Lemmy.

Does it matter? History only matters if actions in the now are justified by interpretations of the past.

Thanks to the internet, we have instant access to the experience of billions of people. All human experience is already there and doesn't have to be approximated by history.

You must mean this:

because they don’t have the mental capacity to organize themselves.

Condescending, like the other thread says, I can see that. How can there be contempt for something that people cannot change. That would be stupid.

That's why I ask, I would like to see it.

It's an analysis, not a solution. Where is the contempt? You can tell me where I am wrong but I haven't said anything about how anybody should be treated.

I agree. My point is that the right-wing workers also don't want a fascist state. Thus there is common ground to prevent it together.

A repressive small state is a strawman. Done right a small state is not repressive.

Socialist revolution has already happened in many areas.

Which all go back to the white army losing. Some say it was intentionally. Can that be recreated?

Socialism locks in the current situation.

The early industrial society doesn't exist anymore. Capitalists have adapted and turned workers into consumers. The old paths are gone.

“Socialism has ro for improvement

Consumers don't want to endure hardship or analysis. They can't stand seeing the problem, how can they be receptive to a solution?

The material situation is the same but there is now a mental problem that hasn't been solved.

To fish for downvotes, let me add that the bro lifestyle is an attempt by the right to solve the mental issues while ignoring the material ones.

And if I am not?

How are you going to rearrange the eggs when you take out the next egg?

What's wrong with that analysis?