seeigel @ seeigel @feddit.org

Posts

0

Comments

312

Joined

5 mo. ago

How else could the USA preserve their hegemonic position?

What happened in Siberia and the far east? Which groups were killed?

so this would never go forward barring a major restructuring of NATO w

You believe that NATO without the USA would fight a war against Russia?

Because Putin doesn't have the influence that the media suggests. Trump doesn't bother to correct the left since it keeps them distracted from project 2025. Greenland and Canada wouldn't matter if Russia were an ally.

Instead the war is continuing as before which could lead to the end of the Russian regime. China must prefer NATO troops on the Dnieper over NATO troops on the Amur.

For regular users the url bar is sent to Google. Be sure to disable that before making it a habbit.

Took some time but a bad pun came to mind. Better call it undyeing.

My point is not that fascism is just hate. I am sure you understood it though because you made your position clear.

Still I am intrigued to read more about your theories. That STEM and humanities meetup or the complex philosophical system that I don't understand, could you give me a hint on where to start digging?

Remember the Musk briefing on Friday. The USA are preparing a war against China. China will do everything to stabilize Russia.

Europe is sending a reassurance force. Europe will not accept the offer.

What if they cut the funding so that people spend their time punching other people?

To me, it seems like a Luke and the emperor scene. They want the hate.

Humanities don't need funding for expensive laboratories. What's holding back people from making their own college?

And yet they call it bleaching and not dying

The internet has created the opportunity to come together but the internet doesn't do the talking.

The meme also implies that getting along still keeps you locked in. Yet how else could we achieve a better society.

See, it works

Now would be a good time to find a way to heal a sociopathic, narcistic asshole.

Thanks. I should have known.

To your believes: Welcome to the end of the Sovjet Union.

We are living in a consumer society because people want to be free without being free. Which interestingly allows 'libertarians' to exist because common workers don't want to be quotation-mark-free libertarians and defend their freedom.

I like how the development of the word makes your point. The word lost its meaning and became kind of an insult. How can the working class not be grifted when they lose the words to analyze their situation?

The problem with tyranny.gov is that the 'libertarians' of today will become the officers and ministers of tyranny.gov. So instead of calling them 'libertarians' we should call them something else or everything will stay the same just with new names.

Then they are not libertarians but something else. This doesn't make those people less problematic, though.

As the name implies, libertarians want to be free.

Tyranny.gov rules by law which prohibits what you are allowed to do and thus think, thus limiting freedom.

Tyranny.com has no laws, just costs, which can be restructured by a single person. Thus the person feels free.

Wouldn't it be funny if that broken spirit is by intention because the possibilities of the internet are big enough that a motivated youth could change everything?