Encrypted? Or digital? I thought the one here was because all you could hear was what sounded like modem static when someone keyed up. Turns out it was just a digital "encryption" that could be defeated with a $20 baofeng radio.
There are however a few places that are straight up encrypted with their own keys, and not much you can do about that.
911 calls are tracked. Listen to your local police scanner. Even if someone calls and immediately hangs up, they have a pretty good idea where that person was calling from.
I think @MagicShel meant we should actually use the information we already have, and prosecute it like the attempted murder that it is.
Neither dry paper nor a stream of warm water is going to clean human shit off. If you aren't using soap and some sort of scrubbing action, it still smells like shit.
All cats are going to have their own personalities/preferences that you'll just have to observe and work out. But probably the most universally loved cat toys are going to be empty cardboard boxes. Put a couple different sized ones around the house and swap them out for different ones every few weeks. They'll usually love that more than any toy you can buy them.
As far as cat trees go; I saved and bought a huge floor to ceiling one. The cats went nuts on it, for about 2 weeks, now they couldn't care less about it. So your mileage may vary.
Pardon my ignorance; But I keep seeing articles "US sanctions ------". What are these sanctions and why would someone like Kadyrov be affected? From a bit of searching it sounds mostly like being prohibited to do business with, or travel to, the US. I could see how this puts pressure on someone who does business with/in the US. But why would Kadyrov or his horses care? That sounds like getting banned from wal-mart.
The poor is going to get to wait in line at urgent care for 6 hours waiting to get it attended to and get sent home with asprin. You really think our medical system is equal among classes?
On the next page or two it goes on to say that whole story is probably fictitious and Bill was likely never there.
Edit: Found it (sorry for the fomatting)
Former FBI Director Louis Freeh submitted a report wherein he concluded
that President Clinton “did not, in fact travel to, nor was he present on, Little St. James Island
between January 1, 2001 and January 1, 2003.” Menninger Decl., Ex. C. Further, if any Secret
Service agents had accompanied Clinton to that location, “they would have been required to
make and file shift logs, travel vouchers, and related documentation relating to the visit,” and
there was a “total absence” of any such documentation. Id. Remarkably, Plaintiff now even
denies telling Churcher that she ever witnessed Ms. Maxwell flying President Clinton or his
Secret Service anywhere, or joking with Clinton about “what a good job she did.” Menninger
Decl., Ex. D. Plaintiff’s counsel remarkably instructed Plaintiff not to answer any additional
questions about the other things Sharon Churcher inaccurately reported. Id. Lending even more
incredulity to Plaintiff’s story, Ms. Maxwell only received her pilot’s license in mid-1999 casting
insurmountable doubt that a recently retired president and his staff would be permitted to fly
with her at the helm.
With the record thus, Plaintiff’s claims about Clinton’s presence on the Island and the
fully concocted story about the dinner party that occurred thereon totally debunked by the former
head of the FBI and with Plaintiff now disclaiming she ever witnessed the Secret Service or
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-28 Filed 01/03/24 Page 11 of 32
9
President Clinton being flown in a helicopter by Ghislaine Maxwell, the relevance of any
testimony he might add (i.e., confirm that he was, as Louis Freeh determined, never on the
Island) is non-existent. The only purpose for seeking this deposition is for the calculated media
strategy that Plaintiff and her publicity-seeking attorneys have devised.
Plaintiff failed to disclose President Clinton as a witness until June 1, failed to notice his
deposition, failed to diligently pursue a subpoena on him and he has no relevant testimony to
offer. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s leave to modify the scheduling order to permit his deposition
should be denied
They’re paid shit and are sick of their jobs and have to deal with terrible people all day and I don’t blame them. And doctors and nurses have to deal with terrible people all day too, which is why I am actually pretty impressed by how caring everyone has been.
That's a big reason I would like to see them replaced by AI. Humans can't help but be affected by that kind of stuff; AI shouldn't be. Prejudices and preconceived notions come with the human element and are not something easily fixed. AI shouldn't have this issue. No, AI doesn't have any concept of pain other than what it's been taught; but I'm not sure many of these privileged, silver spoon doctors do either.
I'm aware that humans are the ones programming the AI and are likely to bake in their own prejudices and opinions, but that's also why any publicly facing AI like that should be able to be audited by anyone to see exactly why it makes the decisions it does. That way the baked in human element can hopefully be weeded out.
What is that purpose?