Usually this is done for licensing reasons. They probably don't want the old code caught up in the open license they're shipping the new driver under.
My understanding is that the new open driver separates proprietary code into a black box binary blob that isn't distributed under an open source license. I'm guessing that they've been very careful not to include anything they want to keep closed into the new open driver, whereas the old driver wasn't written with this separation in mind.
Linux or ChromeOS most often. I keep one older windows 10 laptop around for specific software that won't run on anything else. I don't have to use it very often these days but when I do need it it's always for something important that can't run on any other OS.
I moved my parents to ChromeOS a couple of years ago, I use Linux on my work laptop and on my personal laptop as well.
Facebook, YouTube and other social media platforms are used for exactly the same purpose, all you need to do as an adversary is place an ad buy and you're plopped right into user feeds.
You've got the right idea that adtech is a national security risk and should be treated as such but the solution can't stop at just "tiktok and the CCP bad" - the solution needs to be a whole lot bigger.
You're talking past the other guys point. We all agree that the CCP sucks, but just going after tiktok doesn't solve the problem when they can just buy user data from a broker. You need to go after all surveillance adtech if you want to keep entities like the CCP from buying that data anyway.
Tiktok isn't special here, just about every online advertiser will run whatever campaign you want as long as you pay their prices so you have to go after all of them to resolve the issue. Tiktok has CPC ties, yes, but they're just the tip of the iceberg if you're serious about the national security risk of adtech.
Edit: if you really want to go after manipulation of public sentiment you'll also need to mandate disclosure and auditing of social media feed and advertising algorithms to a regulatory agency with extremely heavy fines (say X million $/day) for violators. That's about the only way you can actually stop the sort of behavior the CCP is engaging in on tiktok.
Adtech itself is an entirely bigger ball of wax, if you want to reduce adtech's social influence you're going to have to take ownership of private user data out of the hands of advertisers and give it back to people themselves.
Why stop at just tiktok? All social media and hyper-targeted advertising poses the same threat and can be misused just as easily. It's almost as if, and this is shocking I know, advertising and online privacy should be very strictly regulated as a national security concern.
Chromium is about 99.5% open source, there's no real problem with the OS itself. If you're afraid of Google tracking just use the machine with the guest account.
Oh I totally recommend Chromebooks, they almost entirely eliminate the tech support burden from having a parent/grandparent who doesn't get computers. It was the dude above me who crapped on them.
Oh yeah, I'm not saying you did anything wrong I'm just telling people to protect themselves when they buy their products.
They make nice eink devices, they just have a tendency to implode fairly often so definitely have buyer protection for a couple of years if you're going to spend on one.
There's really nothing you can do to go after them either, I doubt they have enough of a presence in the US to make a small claim worthwhile.
I'd you bought yours with a credit card take a peek at your card agreement and see if you have any coverage for electronics purchases. You might have coverage for 1-2y for phones, tablets, computers, etc and could make a claim through your CC company.
I like the Scandinavian system of fines for breaking the law. They're scaled based on your annual income so a speeding ticket isn't just a fee for the wealthy.
Chromebooks are amazing for a certain type of low technical skill person. Older parents and grandparents in particular are exactly the kind of people that Chromebooks are for. There's zero technical support burden and if anything goes wrong a power wash solves it.
eBay buyer protection is amazing. If you're buying on eBay do yourself a favor and go find their policy document that describes the requirements for each level of condition that an item can be listed for sale under.
Sellers are often lazy (or scammy) and list items with greater damage than allowed for a given listing condition and think that writing things like "sold as is, no refunds!" in the body of the listing is some kind of get out of liability free move when listing an item as "Used" or "Refurbished ."
Unless you're buying an item that's specifically listed under "for parts or repair" the item must be 100% working with no loss of functionality when you receive it, otherwise you can just open a case and send it back for a 100% refund including shipping. This is a great way to hold a scammy seller over a barrel for a fair partial refund for any missing functionality. Remember that any time you have to send an item back the seller has to eat the cost of shipping both ways plus any fees eBay charges them, so feel free to extort fair compensation if you're willing to keep the damaged item. If you can't get an amount that would allow you to repair the item back to full function you can just say no to any offer and send the item right back. I've shut down dozens of sellers trying to move damaged items this way, all you have to do is point to the policy document and eBay will back you up.
I'm still waiting for a viable competitor to the Galaxy Tab S line. Literally no one makes a flagship tablet that can compete with Samsung's build quality on those, they're pretty much the only ~11in OLED game in town too.
Their after sale support (both warranty and technical support) is absolutely abysmal. If you need support for one of their products you're best off dumping it "as is" on fleaBay and buying something else to replace it.
They've had screen breakage problems since about 2-3y ago for some reason. My OG Nova Air has survived about half a dozen short drops without any issue but more recent devices are just spontaneously breaking in people's bags or sitting on a counter.
I think they're dealing with some kind of design failure where they haven't accounted for display stresses in the newer thinner screens but they'll never, ever, admit to it. That would open them up to replacement liability and drive them out of business.
If you do buy one of their newer devices I strongly encourage you to buy a 2-3y aftermarket warranty with it otherwise it seems like you have a decent chance of just being shafted at random.
Usually this is done for licensing reasons. They probably don't want the old code caught up in the open license they're shipping the new driver under.
My understanding is that the new open driver separates proprietary code into a black box binary blob that isn't distributed under an open source license. I'm guessing that they've been very careful not to include anything they want to keep closed into the new open driver, whereas the old driver wasn't written with this separation in mind.