schnurrito @ schnurrito @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

173

Comments

1,323

Joined

2 yr. ago

That is true. I remember around that time wishing the Internet were more popular among the general public and wishing that would turn everyone nerdy. The first part has happened, the second not.

Don’t forget that 20 years ago, no kids had social media

What does the word "social media" even mean?

Because I was definitely on web forums in 2005. I was a preteen back then.

Not an April Fools joke, this was reported in media I read too in the last few days, ie not on April 1, eg https://www.nau.ch/news/europa/billig-airline-soll-bald-stehplatze-anbieten-66994378

Cookies don't, but cookies are part of an IP packet which does. So yes, your scenario is possible if the website you visited first stored which IP addresses that cookie has previously been used with.

Harder here than on centralized platforms because everything you posted here has been copied to other servers which might ignore your requests to delete things.

My first language is German and this was one of the first lessons we ever got in English: how to form questions and that you need to use the verb "do" to do that.

And then we later had to learn the exceptions like "be" and "can" because "do you be stupid?" and "do you can swim?" are definitely not valid English.

The technical term you're looking for is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do-support

English is somewhat weird in how to form questions and negations, most other languages don't do this kind of thing.

most software isn't public-facing at all (neither open source nor closed source), it's business-internal software (which runs a specific business and implements its business logic), so most of the people who are talking about coding with AI are also talking mainly about this kind of business-internal software.

not as a full sentence, certainly as a subclause: "can you tell me what it means?"

I agree with you substantially.

But just very recently there was a story in Germany where a male elementary school teacher revealed that he was gay. Many of his students were Muslims who were taught to hate gay people and now refused to respect him in various ways (including refusing to go to his classes).

Who is the "oppressed group" here?

It can be argued that it's racist because "civilized" means "western" or "western-influenced", i.e. contrasts countries in Europe + North America + Australia + maybe some of Eastern Asia with countries in Africa or Southern Asia.

You are very close to figuring out some of the problems with "social justice" ideology.

Standing up for all "oppressed groups" is contradictory. For example, in western countries, LGBT people are an oppressed group, and so are Muslims, yet when the latter are in power, they treat the former very badly, so which side do you stand up for? Or try these: https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/erbe/2008/11/07/blacks-are-more-socially-conservative-than-barack-obama https://news.gallup.com/poll/112807/blacks-conservative-republicans-some-moral-issues.aspx

It also doesn't help in conflicts such as Israel/Palestine (are Palestinians oppressed by Israel, so we stand up for them? are Israelis oppressed by the Muslim world, so we stand up for Israel?) or trans activists vs. trans-exclusionary feminists (are trans people an oppressed group whose rights we support? are women an oppressed group whose identity is being appropriated by trans women?). You can see it's possible to argue nearly everything from the premise that we stand up for "oppressed groups".

So I suggest people stop thinking in these terms at all and instead pick some other way of thinking, such as supporting a society in which anyone is allowed to live their life as long as they aren't harming anyone else. Not saying this helps in the specific (somewhat silly) argument you are quoting.

What you describe isn't software getting acquired, it's a website getting acquired.

there is also !demicrosoft@programming.dev

If you want to enforce that, you need to fork it and put a copyleft license on it. This is very rarely done because it's more work to maintain software than to write it...

at least actually post it to !unexpectedfactorial@sopuli.xyz if you leave a comment like that...

They can change future versions to that, not already released ones.

Doesn't PeerTube already do this? Maybe I am mistaken.

In any case there's nothing inherently preventing this, just because a platform gets some of its data from other servers instead of its own users, it doesn't mean it can't use that data to run a recommendation algorithm.

I don't want it though. I prefer choosing for myself what sources I want to get information from instead of getting any of it recommended by the platform operator.

works for me

the main thing I want my instance to defederate from is spambot farms, defederating because of political moderation policies is censorship and not moderation

Nah this entire thread is a perfect illustration why US First Amendment standards for free speech are (roughly) good and should be adopted in all countries. This is where it ends when you start to think it's ok to criminalize "hate speech" or "terrorist propaganda" or "approval of criminal acts".