Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SA
Posts
0
Comments
266
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Heh, I was confused because I switched full-time to Wayland a while ago and that was never an issue for any game... but then you mentioned Nvidia. RIP

    I saw they switched recently to partially open source drivers, so hopefully it's gonna be better for you soon.

  • Yeah... I wonder if it's the same story here - devs trying to interpret the rules in their own special way and Google putting their foot down.

    EDIT: as far as I can tell they kept referral links in the Google Play version and still claim to have no ads or tracking.
    I guess they're still lying.

  • That's not really on Valve though.

    It's the hardware makers that needs to step up and make sure their Linux drivers are well written.

    I'm tired of having to install patched kernels to get basic functionality on laptops (looking at you Asus!).

  • It's supposed to use S905X3 with ARM Cortex-A55.

    There's already plenty of devices on the market with this chip, and it's fine, but in real world as a user you won't really see any improvement over something like a nearly 10 year old Nvidia Shield that's still using a more powerful chipset.

    Which is sad for a new device...

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I don't have QSV or NVENC hardware to compare, but AMD is perfectly fine in most cases.
    I mostly noticed quality drop with very busy scenes and some scene transitions.
    Outside of those the quality was acceptable.

    I'd say on my setup it's comparable to software encoding with x264 veryfast preset.

    And my GPU is 5 years old now, so I'm sure newer cards have improved.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Amd transcode isn’t very good and isn’t very compatible with Linux

    It's compatible just fine. But the quality... well, it's not the worst, but definitely not the best quality.

  • users expect support when things don’t work

    no shit, that's why you refuse support for users with unsupported configurations.
    This is not a new concept.
    It's standard for big companies to say they only support RHEL or Ubuntu, in every other case you're on your own.

    Instead of axing their entire Linux support they could just do the reasonable thing, which is ignore issues that are out of scope.

    Or should they support users trying to run their software on Windows 95, just because it's still technically Windows?

  • But they're not - it's the same old, tired excuse that was never true.

    "Too many different distros" was never really a good argument.
    Just support one and users will figure it out, like we always do.