rusticus1773 @ rusticus1773 @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

99

Joined

2 yr. ago

You were never open to a discussion because you refused to admit you were wrong about the supermajority. And you’ve spent a lot of time deflecting from that fact.

Lololol. First, Franken’s timeline is as stated. Byrd was out. You somehow think that his being out of the hospital means he was present and voting? Are you an idiot?

Lol. Byrd was 91 and "out of commission". He wasn't present and your timeline means nothing. I'll say it again for the tenth time, Obama did not have a supermajority to override a Republican filibuster.

I love that for you. While we have a 2 party system a vote for the socialists in this context is a vote for Republicans.

Again with the goalposts. Facts are facts. Admit you were wrong about Obama having a supermajority. Unless you are just being a provocateur, you don't help your case when you clearly miss the truth and deflect from admitting it.

Moving the goalposts is a lazy form of debate. Thank you for admitting you were wrong about Obama having a supermajority and should have codified abortion rights.

I will agree with you that they should have forced Ginsburg out and Feinstein should have been voted out a year ago. But that's not what you initially claimed (multiple times, I might add).

Then you should just go ahead and vote for the Republicans if your tinfoil hat is on that tight.

You spent all that time typing a reply yet you didn't even read my source...

He never had 60 present to overcome the filibuster and only passed ACA because Joe fucking Lieberman was bribed by the insurance industry to remove the public option. You should edit your posts for factual accuracy.

You like to be wrong a lot, yes? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/debunking-the-myth-obamas_b_1929869

No. Source: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/debunking-the-myth-obamas_b_1929869

The facts don't support your contention: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/debunking-the-myth-obamas_b_1929869

The facts don't support your contention: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/debunking-the-myth-obamas_b_1929869

Examples of the Democrats getting "in power they do absolutely nothing"?

It’s hard to stomach bailing out people and parts of the country for events caused by a process they actively deny and lie about.

I’ve had a model 3 for 5 years and of the more than 10 I’ve had in my old age, it is by far the best, safest, most reliable vehicle I have ever owned. I based my purchase on the vehicle, not the fucking CEO you nimrod. I will buy another in the future.

I hate Trump. Does that mean I should have stopped buying anything American for 4 years?

What if you had to PAY a subscription fee to NOT have Android Auto?

Hmm. I really am struggling trying to predict the outcome here.

On the one hand, we have a ubiquitous FREE interface that is mature and works via your phone (that 99% of people already have and are familiar with with their own custom music playlists) and is updated constantly.

On the other hand, we have a PAID interface that sucks donkey dick in usability with little to no customization or upgrade ability and will need to be managed completely separately from your phone.

The entire executive team should be escorted out of GM headquarters after receiving swirlies.

This is the exact opposite concept of a representative democracy. What we should be asking is that our representatives should be voting based upon their margin of victory. For example, if you win by one vote you need to REPRESENT your constituents 50/50.

One of the major problems with politics is that those elected think they should vote based solely on their own opinion, which is not representative.

The word you’re looking for is rape. He raped girls and women for decades while the institution that employed him (Michigan State University) knew and did nothing.

It is amazing to me that people even consider this a possibility. You’d have to be an idiot to think anyone but Russia would blow up a nuclear reactor in Ukraine. The same for the dam - Russia blames Ukraine, which is an argument no one outside of the Russian media bubble would even consider.