russjr08 @ russjr08 @outpost.zeuslink.net

Posts

2

Comments

525

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yes. X11 these days usually auto-configures on its own (to my understanding, at least) - when you generate one with Nvidia's settings it will add some stuff that is specific to the Nvidia driver, and thus once the card/drivers isn't present, then X11 can't start.

I had removed the drivers before swapping out the card in preparation, so I'm not 100% sure if said proprietary extensions doesn't load because of the lack of drivers, or the lack of the card itself - probably both to be honest.

But either way, X11 wasn't affected by the removal of the custom config, and there wasn't ever one present until I made one via nvidia-settings (other than, it started working of course).

Aside from removing /etc/X11/xorg.conf because I had generated one via Nvidia's XServer settings - nope! The custom config there did prevent X from loading properly, switched to a tty to delete the config, restarted, and was perfectly fine afterwards.

Wow, that looks stunning! I am no where near skilled enough to be able to even begin wrapping my head around making a compositor, even with a library - but I do know that like the other commenter mentioned we certainly need more libraries aside from the two that we currently have (but I understand why that's a very tall order) so major props to you!

The default Web UI also has autocomplete as well, though its a bit iffy sometimes:

It works for both communities and users as well

Google Chat was originally only for businesses/teams (think like a very condensed version of Slack) through Google Workspace - at some point it seems they lifted that restriction, but I get the feeling the actual target market hasn't really changed.

Yep, same! Some of my friends have told me it's a bit "silly" for me to have it enabled - but there's plenty of bad things that occur on a daily basis in my life, I do not think there's a single problem with having some wobbly windows as a small vice to enjoy haha.

Sure, but unfortunately from a user-perspective side of things what this meant is that for me XWayland (and thus, Wayland as a whole) has been broken for quite a while just because I happened to use an Nvidia card.

I've mentioned in a previous comment a few weeks ago, I do commend the couple of devs (that Nvidia has so graciously allowed to work on the OSS side of things) work into wiring up support for explicit synchronization and getting support added in upstream - but its been very saddening from my point-of-view to watch the discussion over at the related issue constantly go from "Well Nvidia just needs to support implicit sync" to "Well we can't, but what can we do to get things to work with explicit sync since we do support that" and back and forth on that for a year.

All of this of course, while the community is trying to drop X11 as fast as they possibly can now. If it were just a case of not being able to use Wayland for a bit longer, I would've still been a bit upset by it, but I could've lived with it. Unfortunately, X11 + Nvidia also doesn't work that great in my case. I have two 1080p displays that only run at 60Hz, and I could hardly get the desktop itself to run at a stable 60FPS without it constantly dropping frames from just having a web browser open which should not be difficult at all for an RTX 2080. I tried every single tweak on both the Nvidia X-settings side of things, various compositor options for KWin, Mutter, etc - nothing helped. The closest I got was using KDE's X11 session, disabling compositing from KWin and replacing it with picom... but even that wasn't great, and came with a whole handful of problems too.

Then surprise surprise, I finally get my AMD card (RX 6700XT so pretty much a lateral move), same monitors - X11 runs just fine for the few occasions where I can't use Wayland, and at the same time Wayland runs beautifully.

They're not hating on Arch, they're "hating" on the small (but loud) group of people who have a superiority complex for just running Arch and doing it the manual way (and tends to see those who installed with archinstall as a cop-out).

Just like the people who shit on those for using Windows.

It was gone from Plasma for a bit, however it'll be back in the next upcoming Plasma 6 release!

Hmm, I can't say I've seen that before. However, it might be worthwhile trying to just boot a live ISO of GNOME (or any other DE) just to rule out a KDE issue. Then if that doesn't replicate the problem, try a live distro of something with a newer version of KDE (such as Fedora 39).

At the very least, that'll help narrow down where the problem might be coming from!

It's a shame that history has repeated itself with Implicit sync (AMD/Intel) vs Explicit Sync (Nvidia) - except this time Nvidia is still not going to go for Implicit sync (apparently due to the "unified architecture" of their driver, this would mean switching Windows over to implicit sync as well) so they're trying to get support for explicit syncing added into most of the compositors/XWayland.

That one flaw is what finally got me to pickup an AMD card this month. Due to the fact that Nvidia is the odd one out, the result is that when using apps through XWayland, you end up with random spots of the application displaying previous frames making it unusable for my case. Talk about a night and day difference that has been.

This is what I do, I can't speak for Mint's screenshot tool, but Spectacle for KDE will indeed freeze the whole screen after a set timer - allowing you to open context menus and whatnot. Then on the "frozen" image you can highlight only a specific section of the screen to screenshot, make annotations, etc.

Spectacle is one of the things I miss the most every time I try out GNOME again for a bit.

I mean, to play devil's advocate here - if functionality that you need is all of a sudden swept out from under you then it doesn't matter from an end user perspective if it's not the intended design for Wayland - to the user, Wayland is broken in that regard.

A better equivalent would be if an application you used every day for the last 10 years all of a sudden has an update that kills features you used because that's no longer part of the dev(s) vision. Or headphone jacks on phones. Or whatever that weird thing with Teslas where they disabled a sensor in an OTA update and replaced it with some other solution(?).

Or to modify the example you put, if Windows killed the cmd shell and only left powershell in a Windows Update.

I have an application that I need to use at work which will never fit Wayland's design, short of me either finding a new job, keeping a Windows install around, or using a really old version of Linux around in a VM when X11 has completely disappeared from all distros (which won't really work) - there will be nothing that I can do about it on the Wayland side because it's highly unlikely the devs will update it to be compatible (since it's a shock that they actually even had Linux support in the first place).

As it is, I currently just pop into an X11 session whenever I'm on working hours, it will suck that I can't do that with Fedora come next release when they completely drop X from the repos.

Plenty fair enough! I haven't used Geany in a long time, and never actually ended up trying it as a code editor (rather than just the every once in a while one-off-quick-texr-editor) unfortunately, otherwise I'd have tried to answer your question directly.

I do think that it's alright to only accept PRs, just so long as it's made a bit more clear. If I ever ran into a problem with Geany, I'd be completely unable to do anything as I have very little experience with C, let alone GTK and all of the other libraries along with it. I could learn right to effectively flip a few values or even maybe try to correct a basic logic issue - but that's about it.

That all being said, I hope someone is able to answer your question one way or another! Normally I'd recommend trying to reach out to the project's chat since they usually have an IRC channel, Matrix channel, or some other place - but in this specific case after seeing the issues you mentioned I'd definitely be hesitant to do that sadly...

Huh?

I'm not much of a user in this regard, so I can only comment on the abstract of the question here - but over the last couple of months I started some new medication that caused this. I'd never remember dreaming for quite a while, and then all of a sudden I did start to have very vivid dreams.

They're not nightmares, thankfully - but certainly the ones that make you wake up and go "What the fuck???". Recently I had a dream about a game show being started in my house, and the game was very much a "You can't leave until you meet X goal".

Then there have been some dreams that were not necessarily odd, not bad, but not "good" I guess?

Last week I had a dream where my boss had asked me to start working again on a project that I lead that was dropped midway. When I woke up, since it was still fresh on my mind, I was very close to messaging my boss to see if he wanted to better set the goals and requirements for the project... Until I realized that the conversation about reopening the project never happened. Thankfully I did realize that, or else it would've been quite awkward...

That last one worried me a bit, because I really don't want to start having dreams that cause me to not be able to keep an accurate accounting of what is real and what isn't - but thankfully it hasn't reoccurred.

I've just somewhat woken up, and definitely had another "WTF" dream, though I am unsure of what it actually was about.

That's plenty fair enough, and I apologize for not looking into their issues to see what their receptiveness was like - I originally replied while I was at work and my break was unfortunately coming to an end or else I probably would've caught that and not mentioned it, whoops!

In retrospect I should've known, I forgot that Geany is a GNOME project and... well, they have a bit of a reputation for uh... let's just say that I myself am always hesitant to submit bug reports myself. It's a tough one, because I try to play devil's advocate on why they tend to be like that and had even commented yesterday on a video about GNOME devs always getting a lot of hostility. On one hand, there's certainly a reason why they tend to have that response, but it's still a bad sign when it starts to color their whole team since I know there are plenty of devs there who don't have that sort of response.

Either way, I apologize if it came off pushy - it was definitely intended to be more on the encouragement side of things rather than a firm "you must do it!" so I hope that's not how it translated to everyone else.

For what it's worth, I still believe that what you've run into is a bug based on my own guidelines of "it doesn't have to be a programatic bug and can wholly be a UX/expectation bug" - it doesn't seem that this dev has the same methodology which don't get me wrong, that's plenty fair enough - but they could've replied a bit more gracefully because otherwise it causes this exact problem, not only for Geany, but the entire open source world.

And if you really want even more barebones, you can just do git init --bare into a directory on your VPS, and then git clone user@your.ip.here:path/to/the/directory and use git as you would normally!

I can't speak for all developers, but personally I'd rather have a bug report that isn't actually a bug, but rather a user error over nothing at all. Because that means that my expectation of how others might use a feature could be incorrect which is a bug to me - just not a programmatic bug.

Some developers may of course not be as of appreciative of it, but I'd say so long as you have a cursory look at their issue tracker and no one else has reported it, then I'd say its worth it.

I love that the brain still relies on real-life data on the world it creates

I've heard that the brain isn't really capable of creating unique faces, so when you see people in a dream - even if they seem random to you, they're probably just someone you saw in passing (on the streets, online, etc) which is interesting!

Realistically there isn't a way to reliably test that theory, but it definitely makes sense to me at least.