Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)RU
Posts
21
Comments
1,072
Joined
3 mo. ago

  • Liar. They only owned 9% now they control 83% of historic palestine. Owning lands do not give right to declare a state inside it. Especially when most of them was recent imigrants acceptes by the past colonizer.

    Zionists never intended to respect the partition This is what ben gurrion who became later the first prime minister

    after the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we will abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine

    Israel decided to occupy gaza and west bank in 67. They admit that they started to war

    The Egyptian Army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him- Menachem Begin

    Zionists keep talking about judea and sumaria. They was destroyed so they no longer exists. The west bank is palestinian according to international law. Israel should get out of east jerusalem and all of the west bank

  • Nukes need 90%. You keep ignoring what i am saying so i will repeat them again.

    Netenyahu claimed that iran is near to build nukes for 30 years. During obama deal , iran respected it's obligation and kept the enrichement to 3%. If netenyaho was right and iran really wantes that, iran would have nukes back then. Then trump tear off the deal as a pressure iran enchriched to 60% and didn't enrich about that for 4 years. Netanyahu was still claiming iran is within weeks to build nukes. So if they wanted to iran would have enriched above that despite no longer have obligation to respect the deal term that was ripped out.

    So your excuse of the beginning that israel only attacked iran because of the nuclear program is BS. You are unintetionally supporting the illegal war against Iran

  • Comparisons and metaphors are not equivalency there is no denying the similarity between the tactic used by Nazis and the IDF. A genocide also don't have to be fast, Israel is a sadistic terrorist state that enjoy slow death of Palestinians as people and as an identity

    The Nazis systematically carried out mass shootings, gas chamber exterminations, and ghettos to erase entire communities, while the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have conducted mass bombings, airstrikes, and ground assaults in Gaza that have devastated neighborhoods and caused tens of thousands of civilian deaths, including women and children. Where Nazis used ghettos to confine and starve populations, Israel enforces a blockade on Gaza, restricting essential supplies like food, medicine, and fuel, resulting in widespread suffering and death. The Nazis aimed to annihilate entire groups through industrialized killing; similarly, many Israeli soldiers and observers have described their actions in Gaza as indiscriminate and brutal, with some soldiers even admitting they felt like Nazis during operations, targeting civilians and destroying whole neighborhoods. Although the methods differ—mass shootings and gas chambers versus aerial bombardment and siege

  • Not by threatening china security . Security concerns is the right of every single country. Isn't hypocrital that one side has the right to support allies unconditionally but the other side not?