I just suffer through any mandatory outdoor events (mostly in silence, but sometimes wailing and profanities are included) and limit myself to activities after sunset, I always keep a bottle of water with me, and I have an hourly reminder to drink when I'm on the computer.
2-3 years ago, an update to GRUB completely fucked the bootloader on Arch systems. I remember it well because it was the only time I was thankful for choosing Manjaro (which receives updates on a delayed schedule).
I would definitely prefer oneninesix. I don't know how many people type their URLs manually, but I do, and onehundredninetysix is just a tad too long. If you switch, I will follow.
What kinds of carcinogens a product actually contains can only be determined iff it is submitted for testing. Making the testing mandatory for all out-of-state products would be economic suicide. Assuming yes unless proven otherwise is the safest strategy that gives consumers at least some level of informed choice.
California requires products (I thought it was just foods, guess not) to undergo tests that prove they don't contain carcinogens; otherwise they must include a warning about potentially containing carcinogens. Most companies don't bother because the cost of getting a product tested is more than the potential revenue loss from the "may cause cancer" warning.
If the game comes in a physical cartridge, the plastic might contain a carcinogen, or it might be contaminated during manufacturing or packaging.
Proposition 65 requires businesses to provide warnings to Californians about significant exposures to chemicals that cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm. Exposure to these chemicals may take place when products are acquired or used. Exposure may also occur in homes, workplaces, or other environments in California. By requiring that this information be provided, Proposition 65 enables Californians to make informed decisions about their exposures to these chemicals.
Or Nintendo itself is the cancer. Whichever version you prefer.
"But they did it too!" will not fly with me as a valid defense coming from an adult person. Your behaviour is your own responsibility. If you disagree with something, either respond in a polite manner or downvote and move on. Do not accuse others, either individuals or groups, of having a mental deficiency, brain damage, or aberration; and the fact that you would try to minimize what you said shows that you understand why I have an issue with it.
If you have a problem with any particular system, express it in a way that doesn't denigrate its users. Some people prefer it. Some don't have a choice.
And NEVER call anyone brain-damaged for any reason.
I just suffer through any mandatory outdoor events (mostly in silence, but sometimes wailing and profanities are included) and limit myself to activities after sunset, I always keep a bottle of water with me, and I have an hourly reminder to drink when I'm on the computer.