Thank you, and no worries on the late reply. I'll check all of this soon. You are right in there being a small gap there. It is normally tight, however I did loosen it a smidge because someone in a video mentioned that might add some forgiveness if one of the screws (or leadscrews as I'm learning) is not true.
Those screws are/ were dry though. I recently put a small amount of WD-40 onto a paper towel and cleaned them up a bit (maybe not the best choice vs a machine oil or something similar).
Thanks so much for all the pointers!
1, 3, 4 I will give them a try. I'll have to see how to disconnect the threaded rod from the motor so that I can roll it on a surface (I've done similar with arrows in the past).
For 2, the top is open, nothing was modified. This printer was bought used years ago (maybe 4-5 years ago) and used to print perfectly. It was not used for the last 3 or so, and has gone through several moves. When we unboxed it again, there were a few broken parts that we had to reprint (the upper stabilizers that go around the support rod and threaded rod, and the y axis motor mount in the back). So it's not inconceivable to think one or both of the rods could have been bent as well.
It does seem like one of the screws it touching the side of the stabilizer at the top, and the other is perfectly straight and isn't, so I might need to look into that. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
Yeah, I guess I should say it's not as bad as I initially thought. It's not great, but I do see why they want some of those rules for companies that are using their firmware for profit without even changing the headers. Must be frustrating, but at the same time, Prusa just invested a ton into injection molding, and the MK4 is > $1000, so.. I think a lot of these bad decisions are trickling down to the end user.
Gotcha. I remember seeing that they are switching to injection molding in a recent YT video of their labs. I'm not sure what everyone is talking bout when they mention Prusa is less open source than before. Seems like just some misinformation I guess. Thank you for the reply.
I have a beefed up Intel NUC running Proxmox (and my self hosted services within those VMs) and a stand alone NAS that I mount on the necessary VMs via fstab.
I really like this approach, as it decouples my storage and compute servers.
Thank you, and no worries on the late reply. I'll check all of this soon. You are right in there being a small gap there. It is normally tight, however I did loosen it a smidge because someone in a video mentioned that might add some forgiveness if one of the screws (or leadscrews as I'm learning) is not true.
Those screws are/ were dry though. I recently put a small amount of WD-40 onto a paper towel and cleaned them up a bit (maybe not the best choice vs a machine oil or something similar).