roo @ roo @lemmy.one

Posts

8

Comments

140

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yeah, I'm slipping after 3 days. It's like putting on beer goggles.

Spam is primarily contained as an illicit act. Normal corporations can't engage in spam activities without some regulation. Around the world there are limitations on spam. As we know it, unstoppable spam is nothing in comparison to unstoppable heavy hitter DDOS type attacks.

If legal you would have to pay email providers to get out from under it. Think ads!

All the neutrality of a traveling rocket scientist working for the highest bidder.

Not one mention of the reverse!

Makes for a great headline, but will it come to fruition without some bait and switch?

Was about to say this. The best way to handle this is break their economic projections.

They join banter in a comfortable way without using character assassination as an authority/persuasion grab.

Teen suicide rate multiplies after the police destroy youth culture with constant surveillance.

TIL, unlawful perfidy.

Which is why they're calling on the International Criminal Court to investigate, no?

Open source isn't struggling. It's a struggle. People have high expectations, and expectations go awry in open source and profit models.

Two men destroy a 7/11. The police throw both in jail. Nobody cares if they were fighting and double daring each other to destroy more 7/11 which will get them in trouble. Both are committing crimes.

We need more of these balanced accusations.

They're both wrong. A lot of people need that pick me up.

Having an electrical background I noticed a lot of logic disappearing into code and still wanted access to it. Also, virtualisation and emulation are a lot cheaper to run.

Nobody likes today's leaders. No support at all.

For all the hype I barely notice anything new and improved. Tusky still kicks it to the curb/kerb.

The guy that put me on to Linux moved to another city, and I cried this hard /jk

Battery farms for humans, basically.

The test is usually whether someone is defending the indefensible, or going to absurdity in misdirection.

Like defending some small irrelevant claim that has no bearing on the discussion.

• The Difference Between “Whataboutism” and Calling Out Hypocrisy
• Whataboutism Is A Nonsense Word That Defends Hypocrisy

I'm fairly sure I'm calling them hypocrites without defending atrocities. The UAE were kinda already on this shit list and don't readily admit it, AFAIK. That Israel is on the list is a no brainer too.

When you're hungry food is delicious and if it's hard to get at your body won't let up about it.

But, when you eat ordinary food it complains about a lack of quality or taste.

And then when you eat great food it stops talking about the sensation after a single dish. (There's some professional point taste reaches where it's too long and it just stops being great).

Heckin long drama story!