good God, thank you. was really that hard, or badly written? someone pointed out my poor English. maybe some people can't simply admit they're wrong and so double down? I don't know
ok, hamas is hidden there. now, people in the hospital, what... what israel govt wants these people to do? to hunt hamas members out of the building? what does Netanyahu want from hospitalized people and their relatives? what does he want?
well, in my rant, the bit about why do I have to add braces to fix stuff is very close to your first point, and the bit about reading while quickly scrolling to your second point, in which you say the right thing: not adding braces is something that one actively does. with no acceptable reason ever, imo.
good. article upvoted. as are also good curly braces after if/else. too many times I've seen if/else without curly braces. why I should carefully read tens of loc, to find ifs? why can't I find it at a glance, quickly scrolling the file? y do i have to read the line horizontally too to understand if the instruction is there or in the following line? why do I HAVE to add the curly braces to fix stuff? juniors get arty with this "feature" and unwrapping their logic becomes a real pain: but it looks so good!
Every single person I know from Israel wants him imprisoned
and somehow he ruled the country for ~20 years, and he's going to be reelected too, you'll see. I'm from Italy and we got Berlusconi, so I think I know what I'm talking about.
particularly nasty situation, for real. in my experience, they know the bits of a framework, but they'll never get to write a modest regex: they'll have opinions on that too.
yes but what can I do about the car?? I do need it, and I really like wearing it on my wrist, i feel so swag!
watch instead needs at least a roof, I'm always exposed to any weather and it's super wrong how it can transport just one person at a time (usually me, in my case). also I think it gets too much scratches from the asphalt, I have to change the display screen every so often. strap it's like super strong, instead.
ok, long story short. two people were released, red cross helped. hamas got these points hit:
they shown that Netanyahu govt wouldn't help release the hostages
see? we collaborate with red cross, dear westerners, what do you have to say?
the narrative, all that matters is the narrative. hamas seem they started getting this concept...
so, did I show you why you and your deductions were wrong all the way? do you understand why hamas, Netanyahu govt and everyone else (you included?) is trying to push a narrative? do you understand now why it's a terrible attitude?
justify either party, and one might get some blood on themself.
I think that trying to rationalize the behavior of two xenophobic, nationalist, religious fundamentalist far right parties it's just a sterile exercise, often practiced (can't rightly say if that's your will, too) to leave out of the discourse one of these two parties, to implicitly side with one of them. that's all I have to say. have a good day
good God, thank you. was really that hard, or badly written? someone pointed out my poor English. maybe some people can't simply admit they're wrong and so double down? I don't know