I became a socialist because I was an "essential employee" during the height of the pandemic. I was treated like shit by my company, the customers, and the government while they sung my praise. I watched my grandpa get good cancer treatment with the VA (shocker, I know, but it happens) while my sister and grandma had to fight insurance for cancer treatment.
We can't make a perfect world, but we can make a better one. And it starts with a socialist economy.
Because people refuse to acknowledge that the US government is assisting a genocide. I believe that Blinken only knows China is full of shit because it's literally what the US is doing with the genocide.
The US has the WARN Act, which requires 60 days' notice or 60 days' pay if at least 500 employees or 33% of the workplace are getting laid off (whichever is smaller). It's a threadbare legal minimum on severance, but there is a minimum.
Don't wait for a layoff, start organizing a union for that juicy 'represented' employment status (as opposed to at-will). Unions can't stop layoffs, but they can minimize the impact, negotiate a higher severance, and provide advanced notice. I highly recommend the good folks at CODE-CWA, they specialize in organizing tech workers
how does approval voting allow for spoilers? The experts that study election systems consider it eliminated under approval voting. It's literally impossible to be a spoiler, because there's nothing to spoil. There could be 4 real candidates and 16 no-name candidates, and nothing would prevent people from voting for 18 candidates. All of the eliminations you're concerned about happen all at once, because it's about having the most total votes. Votes for "spoilers" does literally nothing to affect the chances of other candidates.
As for "genuine voting", how does one determine whether a vote was strategic vs genuine? Why does everyone have to conform to a ranked system that is highly susceptible to runoff upsets? I don't care if people vote strategically, because if the options are check boxes or not, strategy is very limited. STAR is based on instant runoffs with a bit of range voting mixed in. Both are highly susceptible to strategy, as well as several undesirable traits that don't exist with approval. Please explain to me how it prevents strategic voting.
Approval voting is where you mark any number of candidates that you want, and the person with the most marks is the elected person.
The most important issues with a fair voting system are eliminated by this method. Strategic voting will always happen under our performative democracy, which means that all parties are pathways for getting close to the actual goal. It's only a problem if people are overly worried about genuinely "voting your truth".
For all intents and purposes, white phosphorus is a chemical weapon that causes chemical burns which means it's use is highly susceptible to facilitating war crimes, even unintentionally. It's use should be banned from war.
To be fair, the factory management knew that it was dangerous but didn't tell the workers and encouraged them to lick the brush.