It seems obvious that the bureau would want to use "some difficulty" for this determination. Especially if they are seeking "nuance." It also seems obvious that they would seek input from affected populations.
I wonder how many other skulls like this protruded from the cliffs, terrorizing seafarers of days gone by? Another possible contribution to our tales of the sea perhaps?
Fuels is being used as a verb here. The title could also be reworked to say "Canada's surging cost of living is fueling reverse immigration"
or
"Canada's surging cost of living exacerbates reverse immigration"
Gosh this seems so relevant to the Wikipedia highway discussion. Maybe there cannot be flexibility in their rules when they are facing this type of threat.
This is interesting, and connected to the website that predates Wikipedia, https://www.aaroads.com/ ! I never really thought about the folks who ran that site, what a large amount of time and effort they have spent. And to do Wikipedia, also.
It does seem like these sort of hard rules will always come up against hard walls. There has to be some flexibility it seems.
I can't give you European recommendations, but as someone who has had pant challenges, I can make those. Consider evaluating why they are failing. Are the rips and tears in the fabric panels? You may be able to find pants that are reinforced in those areas or are of a more durable fabric. You could also consider repair. If the rips and tears are at seams, maybe you need extra stitching. This can also be repaired but isn't always cost effective. Also consider fit - if they don't for appropriately, this also can lead to increased wear.
Good luck! Sorry if I come off as a lecture and you know all these things.
To add to this, "have got" is perfect tense. "You're a man" is different because "are" isn't an auxiliary verb here, it is just added to "you" as a contraction. That phrase would probably be an existential clause.
What about automotive chrome cleaner? Some of those products are supposed to break down stuff that has been baked on at exhaust temps, far above any oven or stove surface.
I looked at the stove, it says it is stainless steel, perhaps you can use something else that you could not use on chrome steel.
It seems obvious that the bureau would want to use "some difficulty" for this determination. Especially if they are seeking "nuance." It also seems obvious that they would seek input from affected populations.