redditsuckss @ redditsuckss @lemmy.ca

Posts

0

Comments

44

Joined

1 yr. ago

Lol. I love how you start off with an insult. Really shows your rational approach to the subject.

My point still stands. If you can't afford where you currently live, you need to move somewhere cheaper.

If those cheaper locations aren't good enough for you, then why should you get more before the people who live there? You can't afford it. They can't afford it. But you think you're entitled to it before they are.

Rather than move and improve these places, you think you're entitled to live in areas you cannot afford.

You think supply and demand doesn't apply to you and other people should foot the bill for your entitlement.

And of course, you get mad and throw a tantrum at anyone who calls it out. This is why you started off your comment by calling me a "stupid fuck".

Right. Nobody likes to acknowledge when they're being entitled.

If you can't afford to live somewhere, then you have to go somewhere cheaper.

It's part of supply and demand and you're not exempt from it, despite how entitled you may feel.

You're also stereotyping which shows your lack of experience outside of major cities. Most of your fear comes from what you do not know or understand.

Unfortunately, you are already too far gone. For you to make better financial decisions, you'd have to admit you're wrong; and nobody wants to do that.

Good luck waiting for other people to solve your problems. I'm sure that will work out, eventually.

If you can afford a Californian mortgage, you can afford to leave the state and buy your house outright.

But some people think they’re “too good” for that, while they complain about not being able to afford where they currently are.

See: https://lemmy.ca/comment/8157092

He's complaining that cheaper areas aren't good enough for him and that his current area is too expensive.

He thinks he's entitled to more before others who have less, just like most city-folk.

I'm guessing you support double-standards?

Being forced to have home insurance is ridiculous.

Keyword: forced

News flash, you need to brush up on your reading comprehension.

What? Cheaper areas aren't good enough for you?

Why should you get more before the people who live in those areas if you can't afford it?

Answer: Entitlement.

I don't believe that he wouldn't be upset.

Talk about woosh

Jeez, more irony from ya'll.

since you’re outraged

Lol. Any criticism is 'outrage' in your mind.

Exactly. I don't think the government requires people to have home insurance.

I certainly don't have it.

Who is forced to have home insurance?

If you can afford a Californian mortgage, you can afford to leave the state and buy your house outright.

But some people think they're "too good" for that, while they complain about not being able to afford where they currently are.

Not if it was an exhibit about misogyny…

I don't believe you, but ok.

You are so eager to be a victim you have deliberately missed the point.

Lol. That's ironic coming from you.

Poor men.

Imagine if I said the same thing about women. Would probably get my comment removed, haha.

Ignore this guy. He's a plug or just a normal useful idiot.

There's a trade war going on between the US and China, and it's important the US has people like him to muddy the waters.

Found the useful idiot.

I believe reddit is infested with astroturfers paid for by governments.

It's just too manufactured and predictable, at this point.

Can't vote for biden after this.

In fact, I don't see me ever voting for another establishment candidate after what they did to Bernie.

It's clear both sides are losing options.

Didn’t a couple of people mention that was all of it before a certain year?

I don't know, did they? Also, why would that matter?

Weird how sexism is okay if it's against men.

Would you have the same reaction if women got mad about being banned from an art exhibit?

"Women like this always deliberately misunderstand because they are addicted to outrage and misandry."

Remember, the only standard is a double-standard when dealing with modern feminists.

They do not want equality. They do not want equity. They want superiority.