realitista @ realitista @lemmy.world

Posts

85

Comments

273

Joined

2 yr. ago

Well yes proving a negative is usually not possible. In this case maybe it is but it would be such exhaustive work that no one would probably trust the result anyway.

That's never been verified and pretty much every European defense expert has stated that it's not the case.

As opposed to what alternative? Do you have a European 5th generation stealth fighter bomber in your pocket that you've been keeping secret?

Obviously having an EU alternative to the F35 would be ideal, but it will take a long time and a lot of money to develop. For now there isn't another option.

Good to see UK step up in this regard, Europe needs to bolster its own nuclear deterrent independent of the USA as the USA is no longer a trustable partner.

But AFAIK they actually didn't acquire the legal rights even to read the stuff they trained from. There were definitely cases of pirated books used to train models.

Yeah I'm not sure why I haven't yet. I guess I just keep thinking that there's some topics like tech that they can't turn into a propaganda opportunity, but they consistently prove me wrong.

Weird. It's pretty consistent at the ones I go to.

You've got to know the policy of the theatre you're going to.

Just show up late. That's what I do.

Clearly #3 by a country mile

Probably someday, but the article is describing a dedicated orb device that does this.

Ostensibly they should know other rich people, maybe they can make some deal with some of them.

The Russia part is still how it works in .ml.

Why? I don't want anyone here to whom it's not self evident to that it's better here. For it to stay a better place it needs to keep better people who can make their own decisions using their brains.

Even so, are they going to acquire, set up, and use an iris scanner just to remain anonymous on Reddit?

It was an interesting sentiment but hard to read. With the right phrasing and punctuation I think it would work.

Try a search with yandex in Russian.

No, saying absolutely nothing of substance is what made you wrong. Being from .ml just makes the fact that you say nothing of substance expected.