Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)RA
Posts
1
Comments
50
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I tried it on these platforms:

    • Twitter: it works
    • Mastodon: it works
    • tumblr: it works
    • Reddit: it doesn't loop, video must be at least 2 seconds in length, not allowed in comments
    • Discord: not autoplay, no loop
    • Lemmy: no video hosting
  • The union negotiations could include in the contract that AI generated actors are not allowed when SAG is involved.

    Ok, but if they want to ban all forms of AI then we are no longer just talking about the morally reprehensible example of a studio buying an actor's likeness in perpetuity. They want AI gone even when it's used in a more sensible way which is understandable from their point of view but less so for the rest of us.

  • They want to pay for an actor’s likeness once then own it for a lifetime.

    But isn't trying to forbid those kind of deals doomed to fail? What if the digital actor doesn't look like anybody? What if they scan actors from other countries?

    <a history of union achievements in Australia>

    I'm not arguing about the benefits of unionization, my question was about what happens when a machine becomes more efficient than a human worker. Do you think a union could have saved the switchboard operators? How is it any different from this scenario?