I wouldn't necessarily agree on that, but Lemmy is a more mature code-base which is a boon for sure in Lemmy's favour. Kbin's only been in development since Janaury 2021, with the canonical instance being as new as June 2023. Meanwhile Lemmy's been in development since February 2019, with the canonical instance opening up in May 2019.
Even if you check the last week of commits;
To be upfront with my biases though, I prefer Lemmy just for the UI and UX. I find Kbin difficult and slow to navigate in comparison, and frankly, I find many of the least tolerable people on Lemmy to be from Kbin. Obviously this doesn't include you, but my perception nevertheless influences my biases.
The beauty of FLOSS is that forks can come into existence, things the parent's maintainer likes can be upstreamed to that project, and things that the fork's maintainers like will deviate. There's a nice ebb and flow, and there's not really any need for one fork or another to "survive". If kbin stops being used in favour of mbin, it wouldn't be unusual for the maintainer of kbin to move into mbin development, even.
The problem with kbin is that the project maintainer was leaving PRs to rot for months. Even things like PRs to update dependencies for security patches weren't getting updated. The community-based one looks to resolve that by running by simple consensus.
I'm not sure I agree that's a good idea, giving full governance to the community like that, but since Kbin's development has slowed, and the app itself has proven itself to be less-than-desireable to maintain, this is a good chance at finding new direction.
I was never arguing that. I'm arguing that your "we don’t need magazines since it’s all part of the same universe" is complete nonsense that's not relevant to anything being stated.
Though if I'm gonna argue about your initial point, you're also wrong and foolish there, albeit it to a lesser degree. Unfortunately X, the platform formerly known as some shit, is a "Big Tech" company. In fact it's one of the biggest. Now, you may or may not be familiar with this, but the "Tech" in "big tech" is short for "technology", marking Twitter, the platform formerly known as shit, a monolith in an extremely large and broad industry.
As a result, that which is news-worthy for such a monolith is precisely what technology forums such as !technology@lemmy.world are for. It would also be relevant if Facebook lost 50% of its valuation in a day. It would also be relevant if Instagram started giving employees free heroine. It would also be relevant if Google harvested all the world's oysters in search of black pearls.
These companies are so large they they, defacto, are tech in a manner of speaking. Just because you're tired of hearing about some rich dork whose racist father hates him, the man formerly known as Eyore Must or something, doesn't mean that it's any less of a tech company, and doesn't make news about it any less "about tech" as an industry.
Assuming there's 18 minutes of animation an episode (22 minutes - 1:30 seconds for OP - 1:30 seconds for ED - ~1 minute for recap, preview, hijinks), that leaves the full run-time of the TV anime to be 216 minutes.
So that leaves them with the options of:
A 3 hour 36 minute movie
Two roughly hour and 48 minute movies
Maybe they could cut a few minutes off, but movies over 2 hours are generally penalized at the box office for it unless they're massive blockbusters. I've not seen Bocchi the Rock so I'm admittedly coming from a place of ignorance here. So I ask you, but do you think they'd be able to cut out 45% of the content without a negative impact on the experience?
Firefish is a fork of Misskey which predates Mastodon by 2 years. As for why one would fork Misskey into Firefish or make Mastodon, some of the rationale for that is explained in the Fork a repo page by GitHub.
You can ask the developer of Mastodon personally why he didn't just make Misskey better, or the lead developer of Firefish why they didn't just contribute to Misskey or Mastodon, but fundamentally the platforms are very different even if they're inter-operable, and this comes down to the actual design of the platforms.
Maybe if there were enough users, federation might resist mod abuse
This is key right here, but users need to be using a diverse set of instances. Lemmy.world needs to stop being "the default". There shouldn't be "a default". Maybe for when you first sign up, but people need to be moving to self-hosted and/or niche interest instances. That's the best way to prioritize diversity in the ecosystem.
Frankly, anyone who's on a lemmy.whatever domain or kbin.whatever should be finding smaller, more manageable instances to move to as they discover the fediverse. This will be aided when 0.19.0 comes out in a few weeks and enables the export/import for accounts.
One thing I appreciate about how the incentives of the platform are set up is that, since there's no global account counter of up/downvotes, there's really no loss in migrating. As long as I can keep my communities, subscriptions, blocks, and saved posts, I'll have lost nothing.
I wouldn't necessarily agree on that, but Lemmy is a more mature code-base which is a boon for sure in Lemmy's favour. Kbin's only been in development since Janaury 2021, with the canonical instance being as new as June 2023. Meanwhile Lemmy's been in development since February 2019, with the canonical instance opening up in May 2019.
Even if you check the last week of commits;
To be upfront with my biases though, I prefer Lemmy just for the UI and UX. I find Kbin difficult and slow to navigate in comparison, and frankly, I find many of the least tolerable people on Lemmy to be from Kbin. Obviously this doesn't include you, but my perception nevertheless influences my biases.