It's better. Not good. Better than other tools, at least in the eyes of the many people using it.
But as I stated at another post, to me this speaks to the fact that we need better FOSS alternatives for whatever purposes discord is used.
I don't like Discord either, don't get me wrong! But so many people using it means something's missing and I don't think it cab solely be explained by the lack of knowledge of existing solutions but at least partly by the existence itself.
Speaks to the fact that we apparently need better and new alternatives or make current tools easier to use.
Certain aspects of discord seem to resonate with people (unfortunately...).
Man pages are great as mentioned, but maybe not as accessible to some people. Are there tools to generate more convenient resources (e.g. wikis) from that? Similar to how generating technical documentations from (structured) code comments.
I think this is more a case of the triangle inequality in metric spaces, as you don't have to calculate any particular edge to see the shortcut, as well as that it applies to any even non-rectangular triangle.
But what if you don't actually want it, but you are addicted because other people exploit the psychology of humans?
One could argue that it's "their fault", but then everything is ones own fault. Furthermore this wouldn't change the fact IMHO, that we shouldn't prevent people from exploiting or harming other people, yk what I mean?
Anyways, as this doesn't seem to be a loot box or such, I think I agree with you here mostly.
Hello,
as I said, it's about "security by design", which means to design a system that 'doesn't allow for insecure things' in the first place. Like a microwave oven doesn't operate when the door is open.
IT-/cyber-security is a complex field, but 2FA is a good place to start, regarding user facing services.
There are lots more things than that of course.
You can't just compare creative writing to writing a paper.