qyron @ qyron @sopuli.xyz

European guy, weird by default.

---

Read more

Posts

34

Comments

1,885

Joined

2 yr. ago

Being grown doesn't imply we can't be silly. Or that we are implicitly serious just because we're grown.

Highly influential culture? It's a fantasy work, not the cure to cancer. But I'll agree on one thing: corporations are not people; they should be paying to the original creator(s) an efty cut of their profits, from their derivative works.

So you create whatever work. You have exclusive rights to it, let's say for the sake of the argument, 10 years. During that time you never get any return from your work. But after you can no longer claim your rights, someone, perhaps even a company, stumbles on it - or perhaps they just carefully and patiently waited for it - takes it and capitalizes off it, with you watching and sucking your thumb.

No.

If you, an individual, creates something, you have the right to hold your intelectual property. What should be repelled is how easy it is to exploit artists, of any medium.

Yes. Definitely, yes. And I would buy the condoms.

That is trust. Asking for a safe space, under the roof of their parents, that is sign they trust their parents.

I remember the Rafales debuting, reading on them, and the plane just seemed very nice. It was made here, in the EU, which was a plus.

The Eurofighter Typhoon was also really cool.

1 - 7

Bater a mortos...

I've only played the first installment of the series and I admit it always felt too fast and hectic for me. Somehow, I always viewed it as a heist game and not as car jacking game.

It's a functional plane. Why the distaste?

That's the spirit.

But did Germany defeated Brasil in the cup?

I'm very critic of the AI craze. Too much hype, money, time,energy and effort put in to get very little from it. And considering most LLMs are trained on stolen intelectual property, that makes it even worse.

LLMs are tools. The people using such tools give it personality, a semblance of agency, see what is not there and start to consider a tool a form of life.

I've seen people pour so much of them into a local model, the bot develops a quasi clone of their personality. But the program is not the person.

Please, stop making bots what they are not.

The simplest way would be for the remaining countries to raise their contribution. And perhaps have a review of the executive salaries.

Large Language Model

To the extent of my understanding, it is a form of slightly more sophisticated bot, as in an automated response algorithm, that is developed over a set of data, in order to have it "understand" the mechanics that make such set cohesive to us humans.

With such background, it is supposed to produce new similar outputs if given new raw data sets to run through the mechanics it acquired during development.

Nice.

This reminds me: weren't pet rocks a thing at a certain time?

I'll gladly admit cassowaries are 1) awsome 2) scary 3) capable and willing to kill a human but they are not on the same category birds of terror were.

Yes, cassowaries are modern dinossaurs, as in birds, but not birds of terror.

p.s

After writting and reading what I wrote, I realized I played myself.

Cassowaries are in fact birds of terror; I'd probably end dead and soiled if I ever crossed paths with one, and nothing says things would happen in that exact order.

But cassowaries are definitely not Terror Birds.

Most people do.

You're describing me but I am not autistic. Can we again just say it is just a bad idea all together.

Strangely enough, we seem to forget the Terror Birds were a thing.

Just look at a chicken. They are just waiting for an opportunity to bring those recessive genes back.

How come?

"I was just obeying orders."

Under a similar context, was deemed as not a valid argument to shake guilt.