quindraco @ quindraco @lemm.ee

Posts

5

Comments

764

Joined

2 yr. ago

What's an IDF civilian?

That's taking lack of free speech to an incredible level.

Yeah, I hate when competition drives down prices. That's so bad for me, the consumer.

The law in question bans you from acquiring a paper, putting info you made inside it (literally, like putting a brochure physically inside), and then dispensing the bundle to someone else. The law is framed to claim the newspaper company is the victim when you do this, because you are benefiting from advertising "with" the paper without the paper's consent. This was done to try and stop the KKK from doing this with recruitment paperwork, although it's unclear to me why the law doesn't frame itself as having consumers be the victim of fraud.

So they didn't take anything, they just didn't pay for something they allegedly should have.

You:

She ‘opened the door’ to a whole bunch of evidence that had previously been ruled inadmissible, including the defendants infidelity and the entire text communications between the defendant and her husband.

Article:

But, during the defense's questioning, Smith suggested that police intimidated and threatened Meloche into providing his testimony, so prosecutors pushed back and sought to allow the judge to include evidence that the two had an affair. Prosecutors argued that Meloche was not pressured, but that he didn't want information about their affair to become public.

Smith was the lawyer. Sounds like the lawyer fucked up.

One thing we know for certain is that handing the government the ability to mandate control over our information flow is one of the primary tools by which fascism took hold in mid-20th century Europe.

Trump already won one election without winning the vote, what's a little more tyranny?

With two children and nowhere to go, the suit states the disabled veteran mother switched both children to car riders while searching for steady housing. 

What the fuck does "car riders" mean in this sentence?

Imagine looking at England and thinking "this legal system makes sense, we should copy it".

This isn't Facebook, but also of course you can. Why wouldn't you be able to?

Incorrect.

The real question here is why driver's licenses have a gender field; we can't sanely discuss questions about it (including why "they" care about this field so much) without answering this first.

The general answer seems to be that law enforcement can match it against records to determine if someone might be a subject of interest they're on the lookout for.

Since the new Florida policy makes this harder, by raising the odds that a license does not match current records... I have no answer for you.

real stunt fighting

I have bad and somehow shocking news for you.

Granted, Lemmy is a relatively safe place to do it, but bold move, walking out into public and describing Communism as "objectively good".

He lost the vote, and, remarkably for POTUSes who lost the vote but won the election, he also lost the election and only won due to a lack of competent counting.

It had nothing to do with beer and everything to do with our system's bad design.

That would be massively illegal under US law, specifically the first amendment.

It's theater. They want to seem as if they're doing something about the problem, so they pass laws that sure do seem like they're relevant if you pay zero attention, in the hope the public is appeased. How appeased the public actually is, I have no idea.

Nevada state law has no practical way to be relevant to the GOP on this. If they want to use their caucus results instead, then that's what they'll do.

Despite this, every time you point it out, people come out of the weeds to defend health insurance.

There's a 0% chance of this happening - if the CCP is mad enough at him to take his money, they'll also lock him up forever or execute him.