No, because we already track if you vote or not. Here is an example procedure:
Each time Agnes Nitt sends in her vote, we put the sealed envelope in the Agnes Nitt pile. This is what we do with or without repeat voting, because it is illegal for Agnes's vote to count twice - we must record that she voted!
Each time Agnes Nitt sends in a new vote, we incinerate any envelopes in her pile (unread) and replace with the new one.
When we hit count time, whatever envelope is in the Agnes Nitt pile is handed to the vote counters, in exactly the same fashion whether or not we have repeat voting.
That's not how this works. You're getting it backwards. Every time a red state forces blue residents to move to a blue state, they reduce the power of gerrymandering/the broken power of the electoral college, because that reduces the extent to which people are "represented" by reps who disagree with them. Do it enough and you'll shift whole.EC votes.
Edit: this is supposed to be in reply to Beetschnapps. My comment keeps seeming to come out in reaponse to the wrong comment, very strange.
There are multiple kinds of ranked choice voting. The "popular" one in America right now is IRV, but you shouldn't assume all ranked choice voting algorithms are IRV and hence share its flaws (and benefits). My personal favorite RC algorithm is Ranked Pairs. I am not familiar with STAR.
No, bad. She committed the crime of battery and then instead of battery was convicted of badthink, in a country that's supposed to have the First Amendment.
From what I can tell, Shreddie Biologist primarily uses the "World News" sublem on lemmy.ml to shitpost the most biased, least fact-based articles they can find. I think I'm gonna block them, see how it improves the sub.
The school could peint their own, so they will. The private entities that will make bank will be the supplier of the frames and, of course, the supplier of the ink.
Are you asking me to guess? Rampant, patriarchal misogyny, same answer as always because very few countries do do their due diligence when prosecuting rape. But that's speculation, which is what it sounds like you're asking for.
Yeah, talk about an extreme possible return on investment - pocket change for a POTUS.