qqq @ qqq @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

124

Joined

2 yr. ago

This is kinda funny, and I know the concept of "authentic" isn't particularly easy to nail down, but my experience is that Italian lasagna doesn't have tomato sauce. It's always been thin pasta, a ragu, and bechamel. It generally changes to match the tastes and ingredients of where it's being made, but maybe you'd like the version I know.

I had moussaka in Greece a few years ago and liked it too!

As someone who makes pizza from scratch every week, I love all forms of pizza from fast food US pizza (like Dominos), to "drunk" US pizza dipped in ranch, to NY pizza, to Chicago deep dish, but what I make at home is always simple Italian pizza with just a few ingredients: dough, a sauce made from San Marzano tomatoes specifically canned for pizza with some salt, fresh oregano, mozzarella cheese, and olive oil. Sometimes I add a ton of arugula on top too. What's nice is that pizza is also kinda healthy actually.

It's very common in the US to just plop some pasta sauce on top of noodles for one thing... You gotta cook the pasta in the sauce real quick! If any American reads this and doesn't do that I promise that tiny change will already improve your pasta experience.

Honestly I wouldn't even go so far as home assistant. Do you have any IP cameras or just USB webcams? If you have IP cameras all you need is the VPN and then just access them as if you're at home. If you only have USB webcams, you're going to have to stream the content and I believe ffmpeg is actually capable of taking /dev/videoX and serving it over RTSP somehow, but I don't remember exactly how. I see some references to it in some quick searches though. Maybe start here (some blog) or here (Stackoverflow question)?

Another thing to remember is that you're going to be limited by your upload speed. If you're not on fiber and in the US that's likely going to be pretty bad, so set your resolution and the like accordingly.

Sorry about your cat. We typically have a Rover stop in to check on our cats when we're gone for a bit; it's nice to get them some human interaction and they always send pictures and give updates.

I personally have a camera setup inside that just streams to HomeAssistant so we can check on them ourselves when we're out just for the weekend. I disconnect it when Rovers are stopping by though because I don't want them to feel spied on. No need for anything fancy really, but if you really want NVR I just use Frigate (for other things, the cat camera really is just a stream). It's free and open source and really easy to set up.

WireGuard is a very easy way to set up the access. My router has just the single WireGuard UDP port forwarded

The real issue is definitely people not having total control over their own devices.

It doesn't need permissions to be sent pictures from messages though, that's all local and likely done via an exported Service. Good chance other Google products are or will make use of it in the future.

There are definitely good, non malicious reasons to have it as a separate app and that should actually be preferred. Off the top of my head:

• Separation of permissions - it only has the permissions it asks for instead of every permission messages has
• It can be disabled/removed without disabling messages
• it can be reused by other applications if that's a desirable feature

Some people might actually like this: thinking of women getting unsolicited dick picks in particular

Ah sorry yea agreed, at least for the units I know about

That is the simplest possible thermostat and works great for setting a temperature, but that's not the ideal thermostat. The temperature your house "feels like" also depends on humidity. You may also care about the temperature more in a spot further from the thermostat and getting accurate measurements in that location can save you money and waste less gas. There is also the decision of how long you should run a furnace and, in the case of multiple stages, which stage you should run, although some furnaces control the stages themselves. Then there is air flow. Controlling the fan separately is useful if the house doesn't evenly heat. Sometimes you can just have the fan turn on more often and use the actual furnace less, saving gas again.

Also sometimes it makes sense to heat your house slightly more during high demand hours to save money. I dunno there is just a lot that could be done with an intelligent thermostat, it's one of the few things that makes sense to make smart to me.

Programmers love to oversimplify things; "do easily with an RPi and some simple Python" is kinda meaningless. Like, yes, an RPi is a general purpose computer and Python is turing complete, thanks.

For one, UI/UX is actually hugely important for a consumer device and definitely nontrivial, but on top of that, there is way more that goes into creating custom hardware than a bill of materials (which isn't just saying "Raspberry Pi") and choosing a programming language...

A thermostat is controlling a very expensive device that runs on a highly flammable gas that costs me real money to use. I want 0 serious bugs. I also want 100% uptime. A poorly made "smart thermostat" is way worse then the old school analog metallic ones imo. I also want my partner to be able to control the temperature in the house. These devices are actually not simple at all and I assume that's the reason there isn't a good open source/open hardware solution.

Embedded systems aren't some mystical impossible thing - contrary to the previous commenter I actually find working with them easier then designing GUIs - but the commercially available devices are definitely nontrivial to recreate

Smart thermostats do way more than just set the temperature: that's just table stakes and of course easy. Off the top of my head the ecobee will:

• Set the temperature also taking the room's humidity into account
• Communicate with sensors throughout your house
• Can change things via the Internet in case you accidentally forget to set it to a better temperature when you'll be gone for a few days
• Tweak your schedule based on demand

I'm probably missing things, but they're actually pretty useful, and I'm someone who thinks most IoT is shit.

A smart thermostat is the only "smart device" I have in my home (ecobee). I figure it actually is better than something I could design in a week so it seemed worth it. Do you know of an actually competitive open hardware/open source solution?

Yea, but there are also some things AppArmor just can't do. Although in my experience most aren't as big of a deal. Things like saying "only processes of this type can bind to port X" for example and much more fine grained control of file or directory actions. Does AppArmor provide kernel module controls?

They both have really bad documentation though :(

AppArmor is great but it isn't nearly as powerful as SELinux. Way more user friendly though.

I haven't looked around that much in years beyond NixOS, what else has MAC by default these days? I remember a lot of the Debian based ones having some things constrained by AppArmor, but I personally prefer SELinux and it wasn't everything.

I don't know if it ships with a firewall, but that's definitely easier than an ad hoc SELinux setup. I always just transfer my iptables (nftables now) rules over.

One of the few with SELinux by default

I hate this take. That is not how security should look on consumer devices at all and it's one of the ways the security industry is being co-opted to ruin consumer devices. The user is not the attacker on a consumer device. Consumer devices should provide tools to enable strict protections and allow the user to choose. It should be easy to put the device into the fully locked down state at instal/initial provisioning, likely even the default, but it should also be easy to deviate from that during provisioning. After provisioning it should, of course, be incredibly hard or impossible to go from the locked-down state to the nonlocked-down state without wiping data.

Does macOS have namespaces? Can you modify the kernel? An equivalent to Linux Security Modules? ConfigFS? FunctionFS? I haven't used it in decades so genuinely asking.

If I remember correctly you have to do some funny business to change things in the root directory too?

They're completely different operating systems, there will of course be differences. In my experience Linux definitely gave more freedom to do whatever you wanted though. It'd be a bit disingenuous to argue otherwise. They serve different purposes, and that's ok.

But oof repairing things on those logic boards... Everything soldered on makes the hardware a nightmare. I swore off Mac after trying to get one repaired. Had to trash the whole logic board and lose everything. I think that design is almost criminal tbh.

This may be true, which is why you must always let the air out of your home twice a day. Still that formaldehyde is naturally occurring, and in homes come mostly from wood. So it's not an "industry" hazard, and it's not an artificially produced chemical.

It looks like it comes specifically from composite wood and the glues used in making those composites, not solid wood. That seems to be supported by some quick internet searching. Regular wood appears to release formaldehyde at high temperatures.