qjkxbmwvz @ qjkxbmwvz @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

3

Comments

211

Joined

2 yr. ago

How efficient at sinking carbon are trees? As in, once the tree decomposes, the carbon gets largely released back into the air.

But yeah, "shitload of trees" + "some way of storing them at end of life that doesn't result in carbon back into the atmosphere" seems like a pretty solid plan.

Depends a lot on use case, certainly!

Also, do you like a "bottom up" or "top down" approach? Grabbing a raspberry pi and setting up a headless (no monitor) home server is a great bottom up way of getting familiar with things --- learn to configure various services and whatnot from the command line. Or, just start with a user-friendly distro with a GUI you like, and gradually work your way up to looking under the hood.

If you're using a *NIX command line, something like

mkdir $(date +%F)_photos

is super handy.

(He was also against gay marriage, but that's no longer politically relevant.)

I think it very much is politically relevant. Who would such a person appoint to the supreme court, if given the opportunity?

It's not "endless suburbia." It does end --- the state is just huge!

You can hop on a bike in downtown San Francisco after breakfast, and end up in the middle of nowhere in the Mt. Tam watershed before lunch.

And if that's too urban, go hike the Lost Coast. Or check out Yosemite.

Does this precedent have gun control implications? Does criminal activity selectively disqualify you from certain constitutional protections but not others?

I certainly have personal thoughts on the matter but curious what it implies more objectively.

Interestingly, there is only one incident of a submarine sinking another while both were submerged: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_U-864

There's something similar on some bicycle computers, e.g., Wahoo's Find a Friend: https://support.wahoofitness.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000387844-Find-a-Friend-feature-on-the-ELEMNT-BOLT-ROAM

Not sure the extent to which it shares information though.

This is one of the reasons why Linux doesn't have a stable in-kernel API (or ABI for that matter): https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst

Yes I think you used the terms correctly --- it should be referring to the amplitude. "Discrete sampling" or just sampling rate is the preferred way to refer to time, you're right.

I was trying to use consistent language in response to the reply claiming you were misunderstanding the sampling theorem. I think that poster was confusing discrete/quantized steps in time with discrete/quantized steps in amplitude.

Their comment about SNR is certainly true though.

The graph posted absolutely exhibits both quantization and discrete sampling. The blue trace on the Y-axis shows steps of 1 --- that's quantization.

...aaaaand it's gone.

I think parent is referring to quantization in the amplitude/y-axis (bitdepth), whereas you are referring to quantization in time/x-axis (sampling rate).

Given that you cannot lie, this must be true.

San Francisco has a fair number of overhead electric busses, too.

Wait I think I found a solution the Lemmy no poop challenge...

Can I raise a practical question at this point? We gonna do Stonehenge tomorrow?

But you forgot to tell us what RAW/editing software you used, the computer you used to upload, and the beverage that kept you alert and refreshed throughout the whole process!

On a more serious note, really neat picture! I think it would be super cool to try this with a "real" (incandescent) Edison bulb, although perhaps the bulb isn't as smooth on those, which might look less cool. But it would get extra points from me for the old tech/new tech aspect.

You're not wrong, OP, you're just an asshole!