Assuming you mean, I have to take myself less seriously. I make fun of myself all the time. I am, by practice, one of the least serious people I know. I just don't like the art and every caricature I've seen is in this style.
Do people actually like caricatures or is it just a thing that sticks around because they were famous, like clowns and mimes?
I graduated at 24 after taking two years off due to...issues. No one worth accepting opinions from will care that you spent any amount of extra time at college.
Just do what you need to do and graduate with your head held up high. Because at the end of it, you do graduate.
What I'm getting from that is hetero girl-on-girl is somewhat performative and passive, instead of the hardcore fucking expected by the red-haired lesbian (hence "the lesbian"), as indicated by her response that she (the lesbian) would be doing all the work and her accepting the claim that the "straight" black-haired woman (hence "the straight") will be doing makeup as her (the straight's) hetero part of the hetero-homo sex-exchange.
The second half is the absurdist punchline in the execution. Movie-level cosmetics, including realistic amounts of hair -- enough to create a hairball during unknown forms of oralplay, presumably provided by the straight. And a dogged insistence from the lesbian that dislodging a hairball not end the sexual encounter, which required continuous singing. Perhaps it was a sexual rendition of the musical "Cats", further tying in existing stereotypes of queer people and their relation with/affinity to theater and the fine arts.
I'd more believe he said he doesn't know because he doesn't know what it is but has been briefed about it. Instead of some tongue-in-cheek admission to further fascism. If he didn't know and hadn't been briefed I think he would've lied that he's the expert on the Constitution.
Aight, we're done. Your social logic works in a way I am uninterested in interfacing with and your capacity to misinterpret simple scenarios has made the outlook of you developing nuance, unfavorable.
Have fun calling angry people slurs.
Edit: I just had to add that the whole thought process is so fundamentally flawed. Why would you double-down on using inflammatory language like slurs that you've noted made them act more aggressively to you, if your goal is purported to get them to leave? They name-drop autism but I ain't never seen someone so divorced from understanding the cause and effects of social levers before.
Ethnic slurs are different because of their historical (and still contemporary) usage in dehumanizing and oppressing groups of people. And, again, why are you listing other ways to insult people, as if they are fine when they're not?
Life is a rarely a zero-sum exchange, and quite often both sides aren't perfect people. Just because someone slapped you after you called them a slur doesn't mean you're now in the right because they escalated to physical violence.
Like I fundamentally am having trouble relating to you on this. I can't tell if your mental is that fucked, if you are terrible at explaining something I'm missing, or if you're trying to troll. I've come across differences in opinions, based on severity and direction. It feels like we're not using the same system.
It's because the (western?) default image of a break-up is a messy one. You don't just "remain friends". You fully cut ties and try not to even think of them until 4am.
If all of them cannot pool together and find another place, then shit's bad enough that you might not notice. As you now will be paying rent on whatever house y'all were sharing.
I don't understand what the goal behind making this comment could have been. You start off admitting to using ethnic slurs with an almost "whoopsy daisie" tone. The comment you replied to told you the situation but you still add a hypothetical situation about when you think it would be reasonable to use them. And the appeal to "natural reaction" to defend something that should'nt have happened in the first place. "When people question why I shot a guy, my natural reaction is to shoot them too" doesn't excuse why you did the thing that got you questioned. There is no situation where you are on the right side when using a slur.
That's the kind of competition I want. Not a plucky newcomer with fresh ideas, but an industry titan able to burn more money than some companies ever see in an attempt to undercut the competition. They surely aren't factoring this as a deficit to recoup when they pull a massive reversal after securing market dominance. That's never happened in the history of capitalism.
You tellin me you get wifi in the mime box? I don't buy it