Correlation is not causation. They never addressed speed or distance, which are clearly the biggest factors in the chances of fatality and the chances of having a wreck at all (respectively)
The main issue is distance (and speed), not time. Your far less likely to be in a fatal car crash (or crash out any kind) in slow-moving city traffic jams vs driving from your rural house to your job in the next small town doing 85 mph on a 2-lane highway, which is the scenario a lot of folks in rural areas have every day
Pretty sure an organization like Pew knows how yes l to handle the most basic challenges with polling (self-selection bias of those who answer polls). There are validated, proven ways to address those issues with a large enough sample size and specific methods for how and who they poll.
As a photographer and the spouse of a writer, they are making massive profits off of a product that wouldn't exist if they didn't train it. By the very way the technology works, there's a little bit of our work scattered in everything they do. If I included a sample of a piece of music in a song I recorded, or included a copyrighted painting in the background if a movie I was making, is would have to get a license. Why is this any different?
They should have done something more like a commodity license as it exists in music:
The composer of a song cannot prevent a new artist from recording a cover of their music if it has been previously released. The original composer is legally forced to grant them a license (hence "compulsory license"). But that license is at a pre-negotiated minimal rate. The new artist is free to try to negotiate a lower rate if the composer agrees. But the original composer can't stop the new artist from recording a cover. And the new artist has to pay them for it.
Unfettered access is granted and the composer gets their share. Win-win.
The 'pirating' news from a couple of months ago was Meta, specifically. But I'm sure Anthropic did some too.
The issue I've always had wasn't that they didn't own a copy to read/reference. It's that they're effectively creating derivative works from that content, which they haven't licensed for that use.
According to my understanding of copyright law (IANAL but I took a few IP law classes on in college) every author whose work was fed into that beast could have an argument that they share copyright in the derivative work that comes out of it.
The Rolling Stones were always the spoiled rich kids pretending to be tough. The Beatles were poor kids pretending to be posh. There are whole books written about that dynamic.
That would be hilarious. Wolf Hall but technically in the Star Trek universe. 10 normal episodes per season, but once it twice a time traveler randomly shows up.
Resigning would do no good. It's not like a parliamentary system where they need them or something. The Republicans can govern with a simple majority, which they have with a few seats to spare. That even meets quorum rules.
I don't think they're trying to do anything illegal. They just want to do it faster and in bulk. Still from the original source that is providing it for free. Not redistributing.
Looks like someone linked a tool that might do that.
I mean, The Mandalorian started by cutting someone in half with a door 60 seconds into the first episode. It's not exactly "little kid stuff."