if all the “vote Blue No Matter Who” centrists actually meant what they say… it wouldn’t matter.
The problem is that there are 2%-3% of 'swing voters' who are incredibly low-information and not 'vote blue no matter who'. And 2-3% is what US presidential elections are decided by.
As a history major, even a lot of academic papers from 40-50 years ago were stunningly intentionally blind to homosexual subtext. It was never universal, but it definitely was common enough to be worthy of mention. Nowadays most publishings are pretty open about the possibility of someone being homosexual.
Senators backed a procedural motion by 67-32, exceeding the 60-vote threshold to advance the bill. Seventeen Republicans voted in favor, in a surprising shift after they blocked the broader bill on Wednesday.
"Freedom of speech means you can express opinions in your own property, not anywhere in public. And if you rent, that's not your property." - SCOTUS 2025
"We can't possibly rule that the 14th Amendment can be enforced, because then we might have to decide against the right-wing using complete bullshit instead of an actual, literal insurrection." - SCOTUS
No, no, don't worry, the Supreme Court ruling that the plain language of the Constitution must be interpreted in ever-narrower ways (except when it helps the right-wing) is totally not troubling at all.
Literally have commented on the conflict between Zelenskyy and Zaluzhni before. But you keep licking those boots and pretending that "Lack of currently trained infantry in a sector" is "Literally no more men left to recruit".
"Weird how when something is in the news, say for attacking civilian shipping in the most used sea lane in the world, it gets more scrutiny! I am going to attribute this to Imperialist Scheming(tm)"
The problem is that there are 2%-3% of 'swing voters' who are incredibly low-information and not 'vote blue no matter who'. And 2-3% is what US presidential elections are decided by.