Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PS
Posts
679
Comments
410
Joined
2 yr. ago

politics @lemmy.world

Democrats and the Distraction of Woke Politics

politics @lemmy.world

Krugman: Why I Am Now Deeply Worried for America

World News @lemmy.ml

Italy’s new Piracy Shield has just gone into operation and is already harming human rights there

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Italy’s new Piracy Shield has just gone into operation and is already harming human rights there

politics @lemmy.world

Republicans Are Acting Like 2024 Is Their Last Campaign

World News @lemmy.ml

Backdoors that let cops decrypt messages violate human rights, EU court says

News @lemmy.world

Primary Challenger Bankrolled by AIPAC Says Jamaal Bowman Takes Money From Hamas

politics @lemmy.world

Primary Challenger Bankrolled by AIPAC Says Jamaal Bowman Takes Money From Hamas

World News @lemmy.world

Want to watch porn in Britain? Get your passport ready

United Kingdom @feddit.uk

Want to watch porn in Britain? Get your passport ready

Technology @lemmy.world

Want to watch porn in Britain? Get your passport ready

politics @lemmy.world

Rosendale sets up messy GOP Senate primary in Montana

News @lemmy.world

Rosendale sets up messy GOP Senate primary in Montana

News @lemmy.world

“Partisan Hit Job”: Legal Experts Slam Special Counsel’s Biden Report

politics @lemmy.world

“Partisan Hit Job”: Legal Experts Slam Special Counsel’s Biden Report

News @lemmy.world

Republicans Are Planning to Totally Privatize Medicare -- And Fast

politics @lemmy.world

Republicans Are Planning to Totally Privatize Medicare -- And Fast

News @lemmy.world

D.C. to Dangerous Drivers: We Will Slow You Down!

politics @lemmy.world

The political press runs with Hur’s scurrilous partisan attack

politics @lemmy.world

A tale of two electorates

  • LibreOffice works at least as well as Word on its own terms, the problem is how Microsoft deliberately breaks interoperability so you can't reliably share the documents you create on Libre with people who are going to open them with Word.

  • If that's how you connect with a certain community it's not a serious option to stop using that kind of social media without solving the collective action problem of getting that whole community to switch.

    I'm over here on lemmy giving it a go, but it is a real challenge.

  • I think shopping part of google search has the same problems as the rest of it just more so - there is a fundamental disconnect between searchers wanting neutral results and producers paying google to direct customers to their products. The more ability you have to control your search the less ability they have to sell highly ranked search results to advertisers.

  • I can have sympathy for people desperate for jobs, and I can understand class warfare, and yet … once again something that women and enbys spent years and decades building up, is ruined because cishet men decided it was more ‘convenient’ for them to invite themselves into spaces not designed for them.

    Couldn't this same logic be used by men to justify not allowing women into the tech industry in the first place? If someone of the wrong gender being around counts as "ruining" then men could say "once again something that men spent years and decades building up, is ruined because women and enbys decided it was more ‘convenient’ for them to invite themselves into spaces not designed for them." In fact I'd say something like that attitude really is what underlies a lot of tech industry sexism.

    Gender-exclusive spaces often seem appealing to the favored gender, but they're really not good for anybody.

  • Gender is indeed based on what an individual feels like. That's a perfectly reasonable way to categorize people - it's also for example what religion is based on. It's just hard to implement systems where you give different rights to different genders when there's no way to check what gender someone is besides asking them. Probably the best solution is to just treat people the same regardless of gender so nobody has an incentive to lie.

  • Companies are definitely looking for applicants there, so it would definitely be discriminatory to ban men from it. That's why it would be illegal to ban men:

    "The nonprofit says it believes allyship from men is important and noted it cannot ban men from attending due to federal nondiscrimination protections in the US."