If you're a complex machine whose action could be perfectly predicted (with full knowledge of everything you ever experienced) it's still reasonable to punish you for breaking rules - the risk of punishment goes into your programming as part of the (deterministic) calculation of what action to take
I reckon we are so incredibly complex, are integrating so much information that from inside it's hard to see if you're deciding or selecting by rule your preferred path given what you know
You can call the complexity free will, we're all so different having had different parents, different childhood experiences, different education, different opportunities so each has their own solution that rises to the top in any situation
But also brain scans have demonstrated that for minor stuff (like raising your hand) action precedes "deciding" to take the action.
That doesn't work. People with crap lives often can't meet the standards of goodness that many forms of Christianity need for you to be qualified for heaven
Most places have double tax agreements with the US. They'll be reporting their income to the US, but only paying tax to the US on money earned in the US, from shares for example
Loads of people followed Musk when he was making cool cars, cool rockets, insulting people involved in rescue attempts. Very few care now that doing so is seen as declaring yourself on the side of Trump
As someone who's been around a while, I disagree. The tools now are so much easier than those when ISPs mirrored usenet, and the cost is so much less than just internet back then