primrosepathspeedrun @ primrosepathspeedrun @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

232

Joined

1 yr. ago

also, they don't want care.

I said all this.

and I ask again: are you currently having an existential crisis about the limits of knowledge and the fundamental contradictions of knowledge? are you courting chapel perilous? are you balancing on the knifes edge of zen and madness? because that's the only way I can explain this level of skepticism.

I completely agree, but I also think we should be pursuing every avenue of possible solution simultaneously, some of which might be energy intensive. I have the feeling we are far more climate-fucked than is immediately apparent.

okay but I have less than 100TB on my systems, and most of that is backups.

see, if it had an API, I could integrate it into an open smart home app, and it would be cool as FUCK.

you never know for sure until you try though, so if it requires an app, it's dead to me and I don't trust anything else the company makes.

if it has an API i get very wet very fast.

when a character starts being an abolitionist about literal slavery, it becomes a running joke. the goblins are antisemitic stereotypes, up to and including being bankers, and all the characters who aren't white are named in ways that would have been considered 'kinda racist' a century earlier.

i keep imply an existential crisis about the limits of knowledge, because we pretty-much know, and that's the only good-faith assumption I can think of that explains the uncertainty here.

I would say this is closer to the japanese version than the german one, since the riots about 'you are not entitled to rape them, only kill them' and the governent capitulating.

edit: see: the public competitions about which officers could behead the most chinese VS some german POW's vomitting or shouting that it had to be lies when they saw video of the death camps. the rhetoric of 'chopping wood' used by the nearest moral equivalent to a zionist that has ever existed.

a few who were bought and paid for by a specific (and probably the worst) zionist.

the thing is, as shown here, there are no zionist civilians. not one. they are all armed ready and not just willing but eager to fight.

that isn't to say there aren't any sort of resistance, but while they're not quite partisans yet, friendly fire is not the same as killing civilians.

you're not making genocide look bad, you're just making antisemitism look good. fucking stop.

not true! look at all the riots and almost civil war that happened when a judge said maybe you don't have the right to rape palestinian prisoners!

their orifices and screams are also valued. something something chopping wood.

oh, good thinking, yes; that village was a terrorist.

there are no zionist civilians, holy shit. every time I think they can't possibly worse, they find a way to surprise me.

okay but what do we do about backing up the massive library of content that only exists on youtube? how do we back that shit up, so when they break those, it is't all lost forever?

this is why everyone should pirate literally anything they can, even if they don't particularly want it.

er, with a few very gross exceptions that shouldn't exist.

we need to get rid of them anyway, but do we have enough nuclear fuel, when combined with renewables+batteries, for base load?

the reason nothing will be done

nothing will be done peacefully. plenty could be done.

see, the ultra rich die either way. either they kill everyone, including themselves, and end all life, or someone kills them. those are the only two outcomes here.

I mean, i guess they could just fuck off and stop being super rich. fuckerberg could be a creepy robot man who lives above his kinda cringe MMA dojo or something, but they're not going to do that. I don't think they're psychologically capable of it.

oh it's much worse than that. not that it isn't also that and them doing that isn't the reason we didn't get started mitigating this shit seventy years ago when we wouldn't have needed substantial sacrifices.

see, climate scientists are scientists. that means they can only announce what they KNOW, what they can be very confident in, what IS in the data.

the thing about climate change is; it's full of unknowns, most of them bad. so they can't say "we have had this many unknown unknowns pop up and fuck our shit up, and expect (range of numbers) more", because that's predictive, and it's useful, but its not SCIENCE, because science is inherently a very conservative bedrock-of-knowledge try-not-to-give-permission-to-fuck-up paradigm of knowledge. that's not a flaw generally, it's why we can trust it and why it's hard to compromise, but generals and combat sports athletes do not choose their actions scientifically-it's too fucking slow, and they would all fucking die/get punched in the face and lose literally every single time.

so while they have calculated the known dangers of the path we're tumbling down, they can't really include the assumption that there was a military base here during a civil war 20 years ago, and both sides in that conflict really liked land mines. they can only point to specific mine fields they know about, even if that's way less than any other site that was involved in that conflict.

so however bad a climate scientist says it's going to be, dude, holy shit, it's going to be so much fucking worse. however much time they say we have, we have less than that. how much worse? how much less? no fucking clue.

no way to know unless we sit on our asses and let it happen, at which point everyone dies.