Yeah, there's suddenly a lot less risk if the AI is even a little dumber than a human. Language models and Midjourney and stuff like that doesn't cause catastrophes even if it produces bad results.
Ok, I'm no longer gonna argue in this thread. It's filled with either keyboard warriors who haven't turned their gaze away from the monitor in years, enraged fools or actually malicious provocateurs. I believe I've made my points. Peace! ✌️
I’m saying then you gotta get better at it. Your proposal, violence, works against a small number of people. I’m talking about a massive chunk of the population. Not literal Nazis who go around killing people, but everyone who dislikes minorities. You can’t just force them to think what you want, the % of the population is too large.
Authoritarianism? No. Because it’s a problem with a single person in power or a small group. Here, I’m talking about the large number of rather passive opinionated people.
Obviously, bans work on a website. We’re talking about a country though. It’s a closed space.
Are we talking about literal Nazis that kill people or just those who dislike minorities? Maybe even everyone who voted Trump? If so, you’re gonna find that it’s impossible to solve the problem by pure force because that’s half the population!
Post WW2 it worked because, in fact, they lost the war.
Nazi Germans were not present after WW2? That’s a crazy thing to say when they were the ones who elected the Nazi party in the first place.
We should probably establish who we are talking about here more precisely. Are we talking about literal Nazis who kill people or are we talking about those who are angry at minorities and dislike Jews? Is it even everyone who voted Trump? If it’s the latter, you’re gonna find that you can’t just use force, the % is too large.
Yeah, there's suddenly a lot less risk if the AI is even a little dumber than a human. Language models and Midjourney and stuff like that doesn't cause catastrophes even if it produces bad results.