This is what I dislike about most historical dramas. They focus almost entirely on the pampered (thought no doubt dramatic) lives of the rich and privileged, and lettered, ignoring the great majority of humanity that 1) were engaged every day with the drama of survival, 2) did all of the labour that allowed for those frilly few to write their letters all day.
EDIT: I write from the comfort of my home office on break at my WFH job... >_>
I think the issue is that on most people's feeds, the vast, vast majority of the content that they see would be from the @threads "instance." Think of how salty people get about the size of mastodon.social or lemmy.world are compared to other instances, and multiply that along with the threat of a poison pill in the form of corporate embrasure.
Culturally, the fedi is pretty anti-corporate, so a lot of members are suspicious of centralization / partnership with corporate entities. Though this lens, I think the objections make total sense.
Thank you, you absolutely zeroed in on the only part I was unsure about when writing this.
There's no denying that it's a sexy lewk, but the lines going across his midsection to me read like rows of loose fabric. Though they could also be there to accentuate his bear like physique... Either way, in the interest of extinguishing any perception of body shaming, I'll edit the line. ❤
Never forget, Facebook (now Meta) had the chance to federate with Friendica but closed the tap ~2015, once more people started joining Friendica. Their mission is to make money, not friends.
It's kind of hard to pin down the histories of these things, since they aren't written about in any blogs that I can find, but here's a GitHub PR referencing this issue:
Since the Facebook connectors aren't supported anymore, they are now removed. Statusnet has been renamed to GNU Social and the API documentation has been updated.
It's based on ironic interpretations of the words "rare" and "well done." The former is a humorously misinterpreted extrapolation of RPG loot tiers, and the latter is based on misunderstanding the phrase to be meant in a congratulatory sense, rather than the extent to which the meat was cooked.
Wow that's really clever.