plyth @ plyth @feddit.org

Posts

0

Comments

232

Joined

2 mo. ago

So the laws won't protect the children. Then why do those laws exist?

That's why the new weapons are needed, to prepare for an attack.

Why else would Europe need those weapons? Russia has problems fighting Ukraine. How could they fight Europe?

Btw, I say we because any serious war will use the entire population, like Ukraine.

A European attack is prevented by critical voices from within Europe. If those voices are removed we will attack despite the threat of nuclear bombs.

By presenting an arbitrary other motivation, which implies that there is no obvious motivation.

Yet why does my reasoning not make sense? We fought in Libya. Everybody hates Russia and would be eager to fight if Russia didn't have nuclear bombs. Remove the critical voices and we are ready to go.

It could be. So you agree that the surveillance laws don't make much sense?

True if you narrow down the in-group enough and are part of it.

Why else would it be introduced? If they don't plan to lock down the entire internet, the age verification is useless. It could be security theater but it receives full media attention. So it is important. What else but war could be so important that it demands so much power over civil liberty?

This is going to happen. The European age verification and messenger surveillance are preparations to control any remaining opposition for that war.

Then said he used that for evil as he trashed all his friends and wives in a patty

That would mean that Epstein had nothing on Trump. Would Trump betray Epstein's friends if Epstein could destroy him?

Very interesting video. Shouldn't it gain more attention in one of the trek communities like !startrek@lemmy.world ?

Where as we know our money is ours

I agree with the sentiment of your comment but you should look into this. You don't really own money that is in accounts.

You don’t pay any commission

In the same way that Google and Facebook are free.

Especially because of the fact plenty of them are rigged.

Arguably the safer bet if one wants to gamble is stock investing

Haven't you seen Wolf of Wallstreet? How do you avoid paying commissions and how do you get information before the big players have already cashed in?

Imagine spending $250m dollars to get deported.

As others have said: $43 billion. Elon bought Twitter.

Easy. It's a long name but you can rename onedrive accordingly.

Like the other comment says, it must be the New START treaty, but I am no expert. It seems like it's a Russian excuse for their carelessness however some parts of the treaty were respected so I think Putin and Trump had some topics to clarify.

On 21 February 2023, Russia suspended its participation in New START.[8] However, it did not withdraw from the treaty, and clarified that it would continue to abide by the numerical limits in the treaty.

On 2 June 2024, the United States revoked visas of Russian nuclear inspectors, describing this step as a "lawful countermeasure" to Russia's "ongoing violations" of the treaty.

So some parts of the treaty must have been considered active.

On 1 June 2025, Ukraine claimed to have destroyed more than a dozen nuclear strategic bombers, including two Tu-160, at airfields deep inside Russia with swarms of small drones. The bombers were still parked not in nuclear strike protective bunkers, but in open-air, according to obligations under the New START Treaty with the US.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_START

He can legally be president for a third term

Has the law already been changed?

The issue is that because of nuclear treaties between USA and Russia, Russia is required to park their nuclear bombers out in the open. If USA wants Russia to keep them out in the open, they had to make a good argument.

They evaluate reality with other priorities. To them it seems like they are doing good.

Almost all cruelties are committed for the greater good. People just disagree on what is good.

This explains the ignorance of global warming perfectly.