Calling it now, this is the Coke/New Coke/Coke Classic strategy. Coke was good, New Coke sucked, and when they went back to Coke Classic, people were so happy they didn't even notice that they swapped out the sugar for corn syrup. They were HBO Max, then they became Max, added in a bunch of reality TV slop, and dropped a bunch of their other content. I bet they'll announce they're bringing back half of the library they dropped for the 30 House Hunters spin-offs they added and hope people will count it as a win.
I'll be honest, I find that guy super annoying, but I appreciate you sharing it with me. It definitely makes me feel validated that someone else felt the same way
Yeah, it wasn't even that the first one was bad, it's just that all the things they mentioned in passing, like the New Founding Fathers and the exemptions for Level 10 Government Officials, were building a world that sounded super interesting. Then we got saddle with some boring rich family for 90 minutes. I only got around to seeing the first sequel, but it delivered on all the stuff I wanted to see after I heard that first announcement.
The original Purge. I thought all the background stuff and setting were super interesting, but the film itself was a generic home invasion movie. The sequel expanded on all the stuff I was interested in, though.
Fuck David Plouffe. He's been trying to sell this bullshit since November 6th. He went on Pod Save America to explain what went wrong with the Harris campaign. Did he admit that they should have distanced themselves from Biden on Gaza? Or that campaigning with Liz Cheney and targeting moderate Republicans was a failed strategy? Or that their middle-class platform cost them working-class voters? Nope! The conclusion he came to was that they did everything right, but they just didn't have enough time. Joe Biden should live out his remaining years in shame and isolation for refusing to step down, but Plouffe's campaign strategy was political malpractice, and he his failures can't be blamed in senility.
I doubt he's engaged in anything. The man's brain is gone. He said that legitimately believed the Supreme Court ruled in his favor on Abrego Garcia because his staff told him so, and I believe him. He doesn't have the cognitive function to keep up with what's happening, so he's just doing what Stephen Miller tells him to do.
The post credits did have a jarringly different tone than the rest of the film, so I guess this is why. I haven't really liked anything since Endgame, but I thought this was pretty great. Nothing groundbreaking, but well directed, and Pugh and Harbour really elevate the material. I nearly skipped it after that Captain America slop, but I'm glad I didn't.
300 is good, but that's because the source material is a series of splash pages with one-dimensional characters and no subtext. He's a visually stunning director, and 300 played to that strength, but he's an awful storyteller.
Yeah, I'm definitely not trying to diminish her as a character. Her sexuality is never explicitly stated, and the film doesn't seem particularly interested in addressing it, allowing the viewer to draw their own conclusions. The fact that she's a Marine at all is notable, since women weren't allowed to hold combat roles when the film was made, and it's awesome that Vasquez breaks gender norms without being demonized or treated like a punchline. All in all, she was an especially progressive character for 1986.
But there is definitely a theme of the film that masculinity (or what we would now call toxic masculinity) is inferior to femininity, specifically maternal femininity. All of these brash, hotshot marines spend the first act of the film belittling Ripley, despite her first hand knowledge of the threat. Ripley is also the only one to take the time to develop a relationship with Newt, despite the fact that she's the only colonist to survive the Aliens, while the Marines see her as unimportant. They are then immediately massacred in their first encounter with aliens and crumble (especially Hudson) when their big guns and big talk are ineffective.
Besides Ripley and Newt, the only survivors are Bishop and Hicks. Bishop is a male presenting android, but he's not like the Marines, being much more quiet, thoughtful, and diplomatic, stereotypically feminine attributes. Hicks is a much more traditionally masculine character, but despite becoming the ranking officer during the mission, he's willing to be deferential to Ripley and allow her to lead.
The film is about Ripley, a grieving mother, finding a surrogate daughter and protecting her, and it is the characteristics of her role as a mother that allow her to overcome the threat of the Aliens. Meanwhile, the tough, masculine characters she's paired with proved to be no match for that same threat, which in the third act is revealed to be another mother in the form of the Xenomorph Queen. It's awesome that Vasquez represents a non-gender confirming character, especially one made 40 years ago, but that fact that she's a masculine-coded character means she's part of the gender spectrum being critiqued in the film.
Ripley and Vasquez are antithetical. Vasquez's strength comes from enbracing masculinity. She's in a traditionally male profession, she's stereotypically, "butch," (short hair, muscular, etc.), she's aggressive, and she belittles Ripley with her male peers. The film even calls attention to this early on ("Hey Vasquez, have you ever been mistaken for a man?"..."No. Have you?"). Meanwhile, Ripley is similarly a strong woman, but she doesn't need to reject femininity to show strength. She weeps when she learns that her daughter died and later develops a maternal connection with Newt, but she's more than capable of picking up a gun and giving orders when needed. She's also in a traditionally male profession (which she demonstrates when she uses the power loader), but she doesn't let that define her. She never seeks the approval of the male characters or behaves like them to achieve her goals.
I've heard it argued that Vasquez is a sort of queer coded sheild for Ripley, allowing audiences to enjoy Ripley as a strong female character without worrying about her sexuality ("No, Ripley's not a lesbian; that's a lesbian."), but I don't think that's fair to either character. Vasquez is a heroic character in her own right, not wanting abandon teammates and ultimately sacrificing herself so that others can escape. But the film is about motherhood, and Vasquez, just like all the other marines, isn't capable of maternal behavior. I think in the end, Vasquez's character is meant to demonstrate that Ripley is a bad-ass because of her femininity, not in spite of it.
True, but to be fair, if I'd been watching Mr. Rogers as a kid and Big Bird showed up, ripped his own head off, and revealed a middle-aged man hiding inside, I probably would have been traumatized.
Mr. Rogers really wanted to encourage children's imaginations, but he didn't want them to confuse fantasy and reality. That's why there's such a strong delineation between his house and the Neighborhood of Make Believe. He also did more than one, "behind the scenes," episode to show the neighborhood wasn't real, and even mentioned on occasion that his, "house," was just his, "television house," where he would visit with the viewer, not his real house where he lived (which explains why he leaves at the end of every episode). When Big Bird was set to do a crossover episode, Rogers initially wanted the puppeteer to remove the costume and show children how it worked. The puppeteer didn't want to destroy Big Bird for children, so they compromised by only having Big Bird visit the Neighborhood of Make Believe. However, there are two regular characters (Handyman Negri and Mr. McFeely) who appear in both the Neighborhood of Make Believe and the Mr Rogers house, which potentially blurs the line between real and make believe.
Fair point, but that's a question for the mods. If you want some obscure Mr. Rogers facts though, or theories on the Daniel Tiger timeline, I'm your guy.
pjwestin @ pjwestin @lemmy.world Posts 3Comments 1,064Joined 2 yr. ago
Calling it now, this is the Coke/New Coke/Coke Classic strategy. Coke was good, New Coke sucked, and when they went back to Coke Classic, people were so happy they didn't even notice that they swapped out the sugar for corn syrup. They were HBO Max, then they became Max, added in a bunch of reality TV slop, and dropped a bunch of their other content. I bet they'll announce they're bringing back half of the library they dropped for the 30 House Hunters spin-offs they added and hope people will count it as a win.