pjwestin @ pjwestin @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

1,069

Joined

2 yr. ago

You're overestimating the power of foreign propaganda. Harris lost because she refused to break with Biden on Gaza, offered a middle-class economic policy instead of working-class economic populism, and spent the campaign pursuing moderate Republicans as her base abandoned her. Foreign influence campaigns certainly played a part, but they're not magic; they didn't force the Democrats to run an out of touch, centrist campaign, and they didn't create the economic crises facing the working class. If the Democrats had run a campaign that credibly addressed the issues of their base, no amount of foreign propaganda would have kept them from winning.

Oh. Well, that sucks ass. My switch was a present, so I never knew that.

Oof, yeah, that's pretty steep for Nintendo. Honestly, I always wait at least a year for the library to build up and the price to drop a bit. I've heen thinking that a Steam Deck would be my next purchase as well, and if the Switch 2 turns out OK I'll get it in a couple of years.

You're actually skipping one of their handhelds: the Virtual Boy, Nintendo's attempt at a 3D console in 1995. It was such a huge flop that its designer, Gunpei Yokoi, delayed his retirement in order to help develop the Gameboy Pocket, which was meant to hold the company over until the Gameboy Color was ready for launch.

I get what about not jumping to a new thing just because, but that's kinda Nintendo's whole thing (well, that and abusive IP lawsuits). Sometimes it's a huge hit, like the Wii, and sometimes it's a train wreck, like the Wii U, but it's always different and, either way, it usually causes them to innovate.

That's what I like about Nintendo; unlike their competitors, they're not releasing the same product every few years with a graphical update, but that seems like what they're doing here. I'm used to seeing them keep the same system alive for a decade, like the Gameboy or DS, and I'm used to them coming to market late with a relatively underpowered system, but I'm not used to seeing them say, "That was successful, let's just make another one of those."

LOL, weird reaction, but OK.¯(ツ)/¯

Well, that's not nothing. It's almost nothing, but not nothing.

Yeah, but those are just different models, not different systems. Those DSs were all running the same operating system and playing the same games. We're not talking about a new generation of console (except from DS to 3DS, which I would say is a pretty big graphical shake-up).

Honestly, I'm a little concerned. Nintendo almost always tries something new and innovative. This just looks like a hardware upgrade, which is good, but not what keeps them ahead of their competitors. The Steam Deck is already encroaching on the Switch's territory, and it's only a matter of time before Playstation and Xbox try something similar (assuming Microsoft doesn't just give up on consoles and just make PCs). I was expecting something no one else would try, like a duel-screen that could function like a Wii U and a DS.

They could have handled the Michigan problem in a lower key. Letting them speak at the convention and promising real investigations with paused shipments.

Exactly. As much as I wish Americans were ready to cut off aid to Israel, that's just not the case. The majority of Americans disapprove of Israel's actions in Gaza, but they're still broadly supportive of Israel. Labeling the conflict a genocide and ending all military support would have won me over, but it probably would have been a net loss. Still, there were a lot of small steps they could have taken to show support to the Palestinian population and capitalize on the growing disapproval on Gaza, and instead they chose full-throated support.

Before joining Lemmy: "It really doesn't matter what instance you join, you'll be able to see content from all over."

After joining Lemmy: "So you've enlisted in .world, eh? Welcome to the fight, soldier!"

Oh man, I saw these guys a few times back when I was in high-school, but I haven't thought about them in years.

Definitely something punk...either the Interrupters Take Back the Power or Flogging Molly's What's Left of the Flag.

It's very interesting that pro-Luigi posts are immediately and universally censored while pro-Jan. 6th posts are given a lot more leeway. Both were attacks on powerful members of the ruling class, but only one group of sympathizers is being completely shut down. It's tempting to think that it's because tech billionaires have a right-wing bias, but I actually think it's worse than that. I think it's because the January 6th riots represented a partisan divide, while Luigi's (alleged) actions have received bipartisan sympathy. Apparently, violence and terrorism are acceptable unless they lead to class solidarity.

Well, he promised he would stop drinking during work hours, so it's probably fine.

Why stop the quote there?

Because none of that information contradicts the statement, "Its 1.7 billion in tax exceptions," so the rest of the quote was irrelevant information.

I like watching old sci-fi to see how the tech of the day was reflected in the tech or the, "future." The original Enterprise looks like it was run on colorful 8-tracks. The TGN Enterprise looked like it was full of microwave touch-screen interfaces. The Abrams Enterprise...looks like an Apple store with a big chrome throttle. The original Alien movies probably hold up the best; aside from the CRTVs, that technology still seems like a plausible future.

It says exactly what they claim it does:

Good Jobs First, among other things, serves as a watchdog for government subsidies, and maintains a database of subsidies and tax bonuses awarded to companies. Of note is the page for Royal Dutch Shell...The value presented on the page for RDS is $1.725 Billion...

For me, what becomes even more dated than the old tech are the cultural attitudes. The original series is supposed to be an egalitarian, utopian society, but they men treat the women like it's an episode of Mad Men. TGN, on the other hand, is trying so hard not to be sexist that the romance scenes sound like they were written by a virgin who only learned about sex from HR meetings.

I didn't mind the first Abrams movie. I thought the story was pretty mediocre, but it looked good visually, and they captured the characters nicely. The second movie went off the rails, though. They invented interplanetary transporters and cured death. It feels like that would have had massive, status quo changing consequences for the entire franchise, but I guess not.

The original movies certainly have more action in them than the series (though they're definitely not as action-packed as the Abrams movies), and they're also not as interested in exploring sci-fi concepts as the show, but to me, they're defined by fan-service more than anything else. They found an excuse to put the characters in modern times, let Kirk create peace with the Klingons, and literally met God.

A lot of Star Trek fans didn't like them. Star Trek trends more towards, "traditional," sci-fi, which is more focused on exploring scientific and philosophical concepts in fiction (think Jules Verne or Isaac Asimov). What Abrams produced was basically just an action movie in a futuristic setting. It's sorta like how, even though Star Wars is set in an advanced galactic civilization, it has more in common with the fantasy genre than traditional sci-fi.

That doesn't necessarily mean classic Star Trek is better or smarter than the Abrams movies or Star Wars. In fact, a lot of Star Trek is cheesy, dated, and kinda dumb (and not just the original series; even TNG has a lot of cringe in it). However, it does mean that the Abrams films were a pretty big genre shift that put a lot of fans off.

Women want one thing and it's disgusting.