pjhenry1216 @ pjhenry1216 @kbin.social

Posts

0

Comments

938

Joined

2 yr. ago

No, if you're on the fediverse and someone from a threads instance interacts with your instance.

The IP address is only of the instance server, not yours.

Yeah, it's essentially similar in the US. I don't know if kids are legally obligated to do chores, but they can work in certain family businesses without monetary compensation. I just don't think it should be opened up to the point where you can hire any child. But in any case, pretty sure this is a troll post as their first example was cobalt mining. I mean, I guess there's a small chance it's not a troll, but very slim.

Everybody, please understand what defederating means. It will not stop the defederated instance from getting the data. It just means you don't pull theirs.

If you want to actually control who gets data, you'd have to switch to a service like Streams. ActivityPub cannot prevent anyone from pulling data. It only allows an instance to decide not to pull from a specific location.

It's also an indication they're following US law. They can't collect data without stating it.

Defederating won't stop this. Defederating means you don't pull their data, not the other way around.

We don't know what they'll do yet as there's nothing in the article about what they do with the data or how the protect it.

Setting everything to private by breaks the fediverse pretty much. Imagine if everyone on Twitter was only private. It severely limits everything.

A "public" instance is just one that publishes to other instances if I understand correctly. So they would get the IP of the server instance. Which most instances actually do.

Defederating wouldn't prevent this. It's not how the protocol works. Defederating simply means you don't pull their data, not the other way around.

This wouldn't matter. Defederating means you don't pull their data, not the other way around.

The article is just describing how ActivityPub works. What would be more important is how they claim to use that data. But that they collect that data is inherent to how the protocol works. They'd have to mention they collect it legally.

Ok, this has to be trolling now. This is the career you want them in a headstart in? A dangerous job? All mining has health implications.

No career can be started by a child. None that would be worthwhile to get a head start in.

Weird take. Stop trying to make reddit out to be unique in any fashion. There are no unique things to the type of people on reddit or to what would be done on reddit. It was a bunch of people (and bots). People are people.

This is likely related to why kids can work in a family owned business to various extents. At least in the US. Not sure about elsewhere.

The problem is that once you make it available for anybody, it becomes a societal pressure and children won't be given a choice since they can't make their own decisions for what they do. Hell, how many of us were 'forced' to get a summer job as a teenager by our parents?

I mean, a study of how non homeless people spend money would probably be skewed and ignore drug addicts too. Studies ignore outliers that would have an obvious affect on what's being studied.

Are you wondering what a drug addict spends money on?

You could try looking into it at all. Study doesn't use the term. But sure, create assumptions based on nothing. You know, like the folks that think homeless people will spend the money on something else.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2222103120

It seems odd to say the authorities aren't trustworthy so let's give authority to yet another person. Why do you want to give more power somewhere because you don't like the other people that have that power. It's still a corporation. Why trust corporations over government?

Edit: keep in mind one is supposed to abide by law, the one you want though is only beholden to itself.

I mean, be careful, your post has violence and may be censored by some ISPs if they act the way you think they should.

https://tenor.com/7wmu.gif

I find Edge better than Chrome at the very least. Granted, I don't use either as my main options, but between the two Edge seems more responsive and lighter than Chrome (and before anyone misunderstands, I know they both use the same engine, I'm referring to ... well, prior to Google, I would have referred to it as the chrome, but can't really do that now... the application around the engine).

She-Ra was a pretty awesome show.

Sorry, I guess we just disagree on whether torture and killing is cruel. You think it's not. I do. More people think so every year, so I'm just glad as humanity as a whole continues to advance and not stay within primitive ways of thinking. Moreover, the amount of land being dedicated to it is so vast, that eventually it'll have to give simply because there are so much better ways to use the land. Regardless, something that's bad for the environment now is bad for the environment always. That's how that works. You haven't provided any reasoning why it suddenly becomes isn't. Your argument is still that you're ok with harming the environment a little.

And things like racism, sexism, etc are all personal morals. Saying to keep it to yourself while you have your own is simply not an argument. It's a value judgement on another living thing. I'm not here to hear all the debunked and poor logic though, so I'm not really interested in debate and won't respond again. Not saying you can't provide your response, its just I won't care.