pishadoot @ pishadoot @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

85

Joined

2 yr. ago

It really doesn't. AR-15s are everything you said, but just because you take this one specific model rifle it off the market doesn't mean there aren't thousands of lightweight semi automatic rifles that are cheap and just as capable to buy instead. They might not be the gun owner's version of LEGO, but they're just as available and just as lethal.

If someone wants to be a mass shooter they have unlimited options in the USA. AR-15s are just so common you see them more. Starting this decade about 1/4 of the firearms produced in the USA are AR-15s.

If 1/4 the cars sold in the USA were Corollas because they're cheap and easy to drive, would banning Corollas in Maryland reduce car wrecks? No, people would just drive Camrys or Civics or whatever and still drive like idiots.

Wow, really?

Can you explain more?

My experience is anecdotal for sure, but it spans a few cities/ regions of the USA. And it aligns with what my formal teachers/hearing friends in deaf families have told me.

I won't live and die by that but from my experience deaf people are super welcoming.

A few ways

Easiest is to find a class in your area for beginners - colleges and hospitals are the best place to start (hospitals not because they teach them but because they generally know from referring newly deaf patients, or family members of newly deaf patients).

You really only get so much from a class though - some cultural introduction, basic vocabulary/structure, facial movements. If you actually want to really learn you need to get into the local deaf community, which depending on where you live will be huge or small.

The other way to learn is harder, but still doable. Seek out the local deaf community and go hang out at meetups (Pizza and bowling are common everywhere). Immerse yourself and self teach using online resources. Deaf people LOVE when hearing folks try to communicate so they'll do anything they can to help you out generally.

They're so, so isolated in normal society. Any person that demonstrates interest in communicating will be welcomed with open arms. You'll probably run into translators and families of deaf folks that hear and speak English just fine as well.

Keep in mind that many people who are deaf from birth do not know English very well, if at all. Trying to write back and forth in English will have mixed results, but until you're faster at finger spelling that is a good crutch, but try to shake it as fast as you can. When you first go to hang out with deaf folks bring a small whiteboard or notepad if you can't finger spell.

Jesus, you really struggle with this don't you

NK isn't in Southeast Asia, but Southeast Asia is the geopolitically contested region that China cares the most about dominating (at this point in time).

Macron said "keep your dog from shitting in my yard or I'll let mine loose in yours"

It's not a binary option. It's a spectrum. You need to be cautious while driving, which is correct. You CAN be TOO cautious, which is in itself incorrect.

Stop being a pedant.

My bad, mistook your reply as being from the top level comment OP.

No.... It's not

Hmmmmmm... I think the hardware bugs might be rare, but common enough to make this a tricky product to sell consistently to the unknown masses.

Also, I think storage partitioning could be a problem; assuming some number of people would have other drives that they had OS/media together, or just separate storage with files they wanted to keep. Those would be NTFS, which can read/write on Linux but you won't have the best compatibility with Linux program execution (depending on a ton of factors).

It sounds like you're disabled in this area, and it's unfair that the world is not more accommodating.

"Change the world to accommodate my disability and I'll quit being a hazard to people's life, limb, and property" is not an acceptable attitude.

Being cautious is correct. Being unpredictable because you're driving abnormally is super dangerous.

The reason we have a driving system is so that everyone knows that to expect from everyone else. If you operate outside of that system you're a danger to yourself and everyone else.

If you can't drive don't get behind the wheel

Adding pockets costs next to nothing.

You think this is some overlooked thing that the clothing industry never considered? That this is some secret niche that just hasn't been filled? They don't sell. If they did, then there would be brands or clothing lines with pockets, and marked up for the piddly cost of the manufacturing expense.

That has NEVER HAPPENED. It's not because the manufacturing can't be priced adequately despite high consumer demand, it's because for all the shouting at clouds, women, in general as a consumer demographic, do not buy pants with pockets.

"I saw it on YouTube and therefore it must be true, not basic economics"

The clothing industry doesn't make many clothes with pockets for women because they don't sell. Women all complain that they don't get pockets, but then vote with their wallets.

This is a legit example of the intended meaning of the phrase "the customer is always right." The market supplies what customers demand, and for all the fist shaking about having nowhere to put a phone, there's very little actual market demand for women's clothing with pockets. Majority of demand is related to outdoor activities so you see them there.

Haters on here but yeah, it's lame.

Are you trying to describe monogamous societies or polygamous ones?

OP is asking why Western societies frown on polygamy, but you respond by talking about the strategic value of having more readily available cannon fodder - I assume in polygamous cultures, because that's the only thing that makes sense. A monogamous society, assuming relatively equal M/F birth rates, would have LESS available available military men, by your own description.

I'm not sure how that answers OPs question unless you're saying that Western societies frown on polygamy because it was SEEN as just a tactic to raise armies?

I don't know. Personally I don't need a "place" to go visit someone that is deceased, but I have very close family that needs that place in order to grieve. Pets or human family, they need to be buried and have a marker.

When I lived in a more urban environment the only way to achieve that was through graveyards/pet cemeteries. With some land and the option I'd rather bury people at home now, but lots of people don't have that luxury, but still have the need to "visit" deceased loved ones, and know where they "are."

I'm not one of those people, sounds like you aren't either, but that doesn't mean that a graveyard doesn't serve a useful purpose for the majority of people.

Could they be more efficient? Sure, maybe. But honestly do they really take up THAT much space?

Definitely fits the unpopular opinion tag, but I think you've got some blinders on your empathy if you don't see their value.

Agree in principle. Haven't seen Yesterday, but Across the Universe soundtrack is my go to Beatles cover album.

The game defined the factory builder genre. Everything that followed (Dyson sphere project, satisfactory, shapez, etc etc etc) came after factorio (nicknamed cracktorio because of its addictive qualities) was released.

Gameplay wise it's a top down with some vehicles and weapons, which is not unique at all, but the core of the gameplay loop was unique and spawned an entire sub genre of build games.

For the akshuallys in the room, it is possible that there were factory line builders before factorio that I'm not aware of, but none had the depth and breadth and definitely none were as popular/iconic.