Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PI
Posts
5
Comments
286
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • And that was in reply to:

    Uvalde overwhelmingly re-elected the same politicians, judges and sheriffs that led to the shooting and lack of response. Uvalde also voted strongly for Abbott.

    That’s when my last shred of sympathy for that community evaporated. If they don’t care about their own children being killed, why should I? Clearly they want this to continue happening.

    A comment directed at the community as a whole.

    So even if what you say is true, it simply reinforced OP's point that the community is fucking garbage, as the fact there would even be a majority of evil people to override the will of the parents makes the town undeserving of sympathy.

  • Well then, let me tell you what people like you told me when I voiced similar complaints as a young'un: not everyone in this world is going to be nice to you.

    You're the ones who are gonna suffer for not listening, not me. 🤷

  • When you dismiss sound arguments and obvious facts with an appeal to a sub that doesn't even exist on Lemmy yet, we know you're just a hopeless retard who doesn't want to hear the truth, will only get people killed and should not be listened to or respected.

  • So I guess all of reality everywhere for all women and AFABs is a shithole and therefore their very serious need for access to violence can be dismissed to save your idiotic political agenda.

    Or you can just be honest and say you don't care about women. Go on, say it.

  • Holy fuck, your first response to seeing an outsider tell you the truth about your situation is to clap back with a wall of text to assuage your hurt feelings?

    Why not listen to my criticisms, improve, and better your situation instead of immediately resorting to ego defense like some dipshit Karen who thinks he knows something when he really doesn't?

  • To not focus on the semantics but the main point. It's obvious whoever is doing it is being childish and immature so the counter tactic is to be the adult in the room and to talk to them as if they were a child you were disciplining.

  • Like fascists are gonna give a shit. Neither is the military; their oath to the Constitution doesn't mean shit; all that will affect them is the consequences for not following orders and they don't want to get kicked out or court-martialed, so they'll do what they're told regardless of what it is.

  • I'm not the one who needs help finding a partner. Everyone else does, and despite your emotional language you all have failed so hard at it it has harmed you as a people, so who is the one who needs to re-examine their language use exactly? Not me. I see animals cry and want to help them, and when I speak of animals, I use technical terms. And you all very much are animals.

    Your society as a whole needs to have this talk with itself and that's why I ask. Would a matchmaker program help you? Or will you get offended at being called an animal as if I am not one too and openly say as much, a lot?

    I am not asking to be a dick. I am an aromantic asexual and I see the lot of you that are not as hurting because you all can't find partners, so stop getting offended at me and let me help you.

  • The point is that they are a large group of abusers who only seek power and will never be happy unless they get a separate society of their own or take over this one.

    The only way to definitively resolve the conflict is warfare at this point. The U.S. is irrevocably broken and always has been.

  • The military is there to preserve the system and nothing more. It'll mow down dissenters regardless of who they are. The military is ultimately the only branch that holds any real power since they're the ones with greater access to violence anyway, and could just hold a coup and take over the government the same way they do in third world countries.

  • That's not true, weak people need guns to have equal access to violence so they are not subjugated by the strong. Access to violence is just as much a basic need than food or water.

    Your statement is itself extremely sexist. Women are the weak ones who need guns. Men are the strong ones who have power on their side. Nothing can change those facts. A world without unfettered gun access is a world that enforces those inherent power imbalances and enforces the subjugation of women.