Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PI
Posts
21
Comments
943
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • They don't. Keto is the most unhealthy of all alternative diets partly for that reason.

    Your brain needs carbs. Without carbs, your brain rots. And your liver gets damaged.

    That being said, simple carbs like table sugar, HCFS, etc. are to be avoided because they spike your blood sugar and cause inflammation which ages your body. The sugars you get from fruits and veggies are not table sugar, they're fructose and other kinds, and they're mixed in with the fiber of the fruit so you don't get the blood sugar spike when you eat them.

    Eating below the number of calories you burn will make you lose weight regardless of where those calories are from.

    People don't get that because they don't bother to do the research, that's all.

  • LOL this is one of the most mediocre comments in the thread. Criticizing someone's response instead of offering anything substantive because you're looking to forum slide. Well, it won't work.

    I don't wanna hear it.

    The American people absolutely are capable of overthrowing their own government, and they will be morally justified in doing so if Trump wins and actually starts doing the insane genocidal bullshit he's been promising his camp.

    Get over it.

  • Ah yes, the dumbass idea that the U.S. is able to take out insurgents the way it did in Afghanistan and Iraq, parroted robotically by some bootlicker any time anyone even so much as whispers the obvious solution to our problems

    Fuck off, sycophant

  • You really do. Governments can't arbitrarily make you do whatever they want through laws; they have to have good reasons for it that are acceptable by the people, and no one thinks it's acceptable for governments to harm their own citizens over an act the OP emphatically tells us harms no one.

    An act that really doesn't mean anything more than a minor inconvenience and annoyance for everyone else.

    And you want to harm people over it.

    They're not the ones who are disgusting. You are.

  • If there was a law punishing people for not putting shopping carts back, I would deliberately break it and sue whatever stupid fucking government passed such a thing under the grounds listed in the post.

    A law like that would be a violation of our rights. You can't just use government to force people to do whatever you want. We have rights.

  • You can tell people that they have to shut off their lives completely just to convenience you and be just as honest.

    Or you can keep getting angry at me because you don't want to hear the truth. Your choice. 🤷